Cash grants or vote procurement strategy?

Jun 05, 2022 Letters

Dear Editor,

I note with interest the disbursement of cash grants to select sections of society within recent times. I have two concerns.
Firstly, there is the question of inequality in this operation. Secondly, there is the question of sustainable communities and livelihood. Can these cash grants, disbursed as they are being disbursed engender sustainability in the lives of the recipients?
Sugar workers (past and present), whether severed and in receipt of severance benefits or currently employed, received two hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) each. Fisherfolk (coastal) got one hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) each. Cash crop farmers got one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) each regardless of the acreage they cultivate, while rice farmers got twenty thousand dollar ($20,000) for each acre they cultivate. Coastal farmers were reportedly promised free fertilizers. Residents of riverine communities will get twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) each.
Hundreds of citizens, perceived to be supporters of the APNU+AFC Administration of 2015 to 2020 were fired from their jobs. Hundreds more were forced to resign through applied political pressure. Some were made redundant. Most will never be re-employed by the public sector organisation under this Administration. Many private entities refuse to employ these people for fear of losing their lucrative government contracts. These are mostly poor working class citizens with families to feed with meagre or no income at all.
Why is there no cash grant for these citizens? Why? Is it a case of vote procurement and those whose votes cannot be bought must suffer?
Then there is the issue of the residents of riverine communities. These communities are predominantly in Guyana’s hinterland. The residents of these communities are predominantly Indigenous Guyanese. Indigenous Guyanese in these communities are all farmers and fisher folk!
How can it be fair and reasonable for persons who are both farmers and fisherfolk to be promised twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) when other farmers and fisherfolk get between one hundred and two hundred and fifty thousand dollars each ($100,000 – $250,000)? Where is the equality? Where is the fairness and reasonableness?
It is clear that those perceived as non-supporters of the PPP and Guyana’s Indigenous population are second-class citizens in this ‘One Guyana’ equation. We are worth less and placed in a category way below the highly valued sugar workers, rice farmers and fisherfolk of coastal Guyana. So much for the empty, useless, ‘One Guyana’ slogan.
I am yet to hear how the PPP plans to bring about sustainable communities and livelihoods through unequal, discriminatory cash grants, which closely resembles a vote procurement strategy rollout.

Sincerely,
Mervyn Williams

Latest News

Cash grants or vote procurement strategy?

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show | November, 20th, 2024

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Shadman hits fifty, WI drop three catches on truncated day

Jai Signs on board with Kashif and Shanghai...

Marian Academy and Waramuri Primary set for...

Kharag family to sponsor feature event at Kennard...

Showstoppers, Pouderoyen, Brothers and Team...

Diamond Mineral Water Indoor Hockey Championship...

Features/Columnists

A little room to breathe and a podium of their own!

Haiti: Tragically Descending into Deeper Crisis

From one sacred cow to another untouchable

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]

Cash grants or vote procurement strategy?

Share this:

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show | November, 20th, 2024

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]