Latest update January 25th, 2025 10:23 PM
Nov 24, 2021 Letters
Dear Editor,
Kaieteur News – I read with amazement and utter shock in the Monday, November 22 edition of Stabroek News that the South Rupununi District Council (SRDC) is calling for the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission to rescind the Marudi mining agreement.
First of all, as an indigenous resident of the South Rupununi for over forty-five years, I wish to set the record starting that the SRDC is not representing all the people of the South Rupununi, but only a select few who are mostly members of the said SRDC and their affiliates. The Council is marred by self-interest and other motives, rather than representing the people collectively in the interest of uniting our people for the common good of community development.
Editor, the SRDC, and its Executives Members are really out of touch with the realities on the ground in Marudi and in relation to the recently signed agreement by several parties. To alleviate my ignorance of this matter I recently reached out to several individuals and agencies simply because the SRDC is not trusted nor respected by the majority of residents in the South Rupununi.
As such, I can safely state that small miners from South Rupununi who were once requested to cease operations within Marudi and were compliant is now given approval to resume mining under an agreement with a mine plan, and monitoring system for regulated mining activities. Additionally, the large-scale mining company is NOT engaged in any mining with the exception of exploration activities, only exploration is permitted as per the company’s prospecting licence and strengthened by the agreement, which was recently signed.
The SRDC is so out of touch with the people they claim to represent that they are unaware that it was the residents and small miners from the South Rupununi who have been pushing for the resumption of small-scale mining activities in Marudi. This will create employment and opportunities for the residents, something the SRDC has failed to do, but rather openly engage in self-interest activities. Further, I was advised that the decision to resume small-scale mining was a long and consultative process, which included the small miners who are also indigenous, RDC, RMA, and Romanex/Aurous, and the mining regulatory agency.
It must be noted that the “small miners” are from the South Rupununi and the surrounding indigenous communities stand to benefit the most from the resumption of small-scale mining activities. This will be in the form of employment, provision of goods and services that are necessary to sustain small-scale mining operations.
Finally, all I ask is for the SRDC to be more honest, diligent and wholehearted in representing the interest of all the indigenous people not only South Rupununi but all of Guyana. I wish to restate that the SDRC will be unmasked for their duplicity and self-interest by denying employment and other opportunities to my fellow indigenous brother and sisters. Therefore, on my own behalf and also those not openly able to state their support, we wish to endorse the resumption of small-scale mining and exploration activities for the benefit of all indigenous communities within South Rupununi. The government through the Ministry of Natural Resources, the regulatory agency, and collaboratively with other stakeholders acted wisely in the interest of our indigenous brothers and sisters of South Rupununi and all of Region 9.
Sincerely
T. Williams
Jan 25, 2025
SportsMax – After producing some stellar performances in 2024, it comes as no surprise that West Indies’ Hayley Matthews and Sherfane Rutherford were named in the ICC Women’s and Men’s...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- In one of the most impassioned pleas ever made, an evangelical Bishop Rev. Mariann Edgar... more
Antiguan Barbudan Ambassador to the United States, Sir Ronald Sanders By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The upcoming election... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]