The DPP’s Office appears to have failed to deliver on vital responsibilities

Jul 25, 2021 Letters

Dear Editor,

There seems to be a drastic problem within the Office of The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). From 6th October, 2020 to now, there have been no less than thirteen (13) cases of serious offences which have been dismissed by various Courts because of No Case Submissions. These included 10 murder cases involving 14 accused, one case of armed robbery involving three persons accused of attempting to rob the Republic Bank on Water St., one case of threatening to bomb the University of Guyana, and one case of causing death by dangerous driving.
In each of these instances, the case was dismissed or discharged because the defence said they had no case to defend as the prosecutors had failed to produce enough evidence against the defendants. This means that the DPP’s Office failed to produce enough evidence for the cases against the defendants to warrant the continuance of the trial, with the judges or magistrates agreeing to the No Case Submissions presented.
Why is the DPP’s Office wasting valuable resources by taking to trial these cases which are lacking sufficient evidence? Prosecutors working in that Office are highly trained lawyers who represent the State in seeking justice. However, it is unjust for persons to be: arrested, charged, and in many cases remanded to prison (for many years), only to be freed because of a No Case Submission.
The website for the DPP’s Office states that while it does not conduct investigations into criminal offences, it provides legal advice to the various law enforcement agencies. The website continues: “We give personal and individualized attention to each police file, sifting through thousands of statements annually because each case is important to us as it is to you. We are committed to: hard work, service, justice, transparency and integrity. We work to ensure that justice is done in each case.” ( https://www.dpp.gy/)
Therefore, the DPP’s Office should be advising the law enforcement agencies, that where necessary, they need to have stronger evidence provided, before the accused can be brought to Court. It makes no sense going to Court to prosecute an accused with a weak case. Thirteen cases of serious criminal offences within a year, being thrown out of Court for a lack of evidence, is a serious indictment of the DPP’s Office. It would appear that the DPP’s Office has not been providing excellent legal advice to the law enforcement agencies and in so doing, damaging Guyana’s legal system.

Regards,
Jonathan Yearwood

Latest News

The DPP’s Office appears to have failed to deliver on vital responsibilities

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show | December, 2nd, 2024

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

India produce dominant 60-run win over West Indies to claim 2-1 T20I...

Guyanese athletes make mark at second Kares Cross...

Minister Ramson tables historic Guyana Horse...

Trophy Stall on board with Petra-KFC Goodwill...

Topp XX and Winners Connection seeking...

GFF and MEYBA launch new kits to unite Guyanese...

Features/Columnists

A question of timing and priorities

Let the asylum seekers go: a first step for Venezuela to rebuild relations in the Americas

Upcoming elections rich with opportunities

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]

The DPP’s Office appears to have failed to deliver on vital responsibilities

Share this:

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show | December, 2nd, 2024

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]