Latest update December 19th, 2024 3:22 AM
Jul 18, 2021 Letters
Dear Editor,
It is extraordinary that the Mayor and City Councillors can find money to hire a lawyer to represent the Acting Town Clerk, Ms. Sherry Jerrick, at the Local Government Commission but do not have money to do basic sanitation work in the city, and to pay workers deductions at the National Insurance Scheme and the Guyana Revenue Authority.
A few nights ago, the Mayor, Mr. Ubraj Narine, appeared on HGTV Nightly News and represented the position taken by the Council against the Local Government Commission’s request to the Acting Town Clerk, for her to show cause why she should not be disciplined for professional negligence, for not preparing and submitting the Council’s Asset Register. In that newscast, the Mayor said words to the effect that the Commission has no authority to deal with such matters as the Council’s Asset Register. And that it is the Council’s Asset Register and as such the Commission could not blame the Town Clerk for not producing it. However, two things are glaringly wrong with the Mayor’s comments.
First, this request for the Council’s Asset Register was made by the Local Government Commission chaired by Mr. Mortimer Mingo, in 2019. At that time, Mrs. Sharon Harry-Munroe was the Acting Town Clerk of the Council. She was unable to produce that document in the requested time. As a result of that and other alleged shortcomings, that Commission, after having her on a long and embarrassing period of administrative leave, terminated her service. The records of the council will show that the very mayor, Mr. Narine, who is now publicly challenging the Commission, and threatening to go to court, did not say to that Commission, chaired by Mr. Mingo, in 2019, that it had no authority to request the Asset Register. And Mrs. Harry-Munroe, was never even asked, about, let alone afforded, legal representation by the Council. Why? Because they wanted her off the job. Not too long after the termination of her service, the council attempted to recruit, through an inadequate and shambolic process, hand- picked individuals to fill certain vacancies including, the position of the Town Clerk; they failed.
In the instant case, involving Ms. Jerrick, not only is the council attempting to say to the Commission that it does not have the authority but has instructed the Acting Town Clerk to take a lawyer of her choice. They did that at the last Statutory Meeting, held Monday July 12, 2021, without any regards to the cost. It is an unfortunate and unfair action of the council. While citizens have to wade through storm water in certain parts of the city whenever it rains, and contend with garbage almost everywhere, in Georgetown, the mayor found the money to hire a lawyer to deal with this matter. While roofs on market are like sieves during rains, the only Abattoir in this city is a public health hazard, and the Mayoral Complex is in a state of disrepair, the mayor can proudly hire a lawyer to fight the Commission. It is unbelievable. Worse, in this period of Covid-19, the Council has taken a decision to make hundreds of workers (all women, some single parents) from its Day Care Service, and General Works Department (able-bodied men and women) redundant because it claimed that it can’t find the money to keep them on staff. But, the council can find hundreds of thousands of dollars, to hire a lawyer to represent one officer in what is basically a purely administrative matter. It is disgusting to say the least and scandalous at worse. How is it that the council do not have money to assist staff but have enough to hire lawyers to defend matters that do not add value to the service they are providing to the public (they hired lawyers to get the current city engineer dismissed; they lost the case, they hire lawyers to get hand-picked individuals to fill top posts; that matter is before the courts).
This document was requested since 2019. Up until now, in 2021, nothing has been sent to the Commission. One must wonder why the fuss and spare no expense attitude by the Mayor to protect a particular officer, while he and a small clique of councillors attempted to have others dismissed, including the current City Engineer. One must wonder too the effect this is having on the morale of other officers and workers at the Georgetown City Council.
Stunningly, the Mayor of Guyana’s capital appears not to know basic things about how the Georgetown municipality operates. Two examples: The Mayor seems to be unaware that a substantial part of the responsibility of the Town Clerk, who is the Chief Administrator of the Council and secretary to all the committees of the council, is concerned with archives, records and documents. In Chap 28:01, it says that the Clerk “… shall have the charge and custody of, and be responsible for, all charts, deeds, records and other documents belonging to the council which shall be kept as the council may direct.” The question is if it is not the responsibility of the Town Clerk to have an Asset Register for the council, as the mayor is claiming then he must say whose responsibility it is. Who should the Commission look to for such an important document? The Act is very clear.
The next example is the utterances by the mayor about the lack of authority of the Commission to request certain documents. It is true that the Commission does not have authority over elected Councilors; the mayor is a councillor who has been elected chairman of the council. But the Commission, in a real way, has powers over all human resources and related matters.
However, according to Act 2013, under functions of the Commission, “Section 13 (I) The Commission shall have power to deal with all matters relating to the regulation and staffing of local government organs including employment and dismissal of staff and with dispute resolution within and between local government organs, and in particular shall – (a) monitor; and review the performance and implementation of policies of all local government organs, including policies of taxation and protection of the environment: (b) monitor, evaluate and make recommendations on policies, procedures and practices of all local government organs in order to promote effective local governance…” Also, under Miscellaneous at “28. The Commission may require a local government organ to furnish to it at intervals as may be specified and at other times as the Commission may require a detailed report of finances and activities in the form and containing the particulars as the Commission may specify.” And, at “27. It shall be the duty of every local government organ to co-operate with the Commission, its officers and employees in the discharge of their functions and for that purpose, to comply with all requests made or directions given by the Commission or its officers and employees.”
In the face of a deteriorating city and poor municipal services, the mayor is constantly involved in public verbal battles with the government, other bodies and even some officers of the council. Councillors seem unable to do anything about all that is happening at City Hall. It is as if the council has gone rogue with no clear sense of direction and purpose. In this 21st century citizens continue not only to be embarrassed with the state of the City, but the public health of their communities is being put at risk by a council that appears leaderless and visionless.
Yours truly,
Anthony Subner
Dec 19, 2024
Fifth Annual KFC Goodwill Int’l Football Series Kaieteur Sports-The 2024 KFC Under-18 International Goodwill Football Series, which is coordinated by the Petra Organisation, continued yesterday at...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- In any vibrant democracy, the mechanisms that bind it together are those that mediate differences,... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – The government of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela has steadfast support from many... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]