Latest update December 4th, 2024 2:40 AM
Jul 19, 2020 Letters
Dear editor:
It is clear now that the APNU+AFC is seeking to conjure (no doubt emanating from Seven Ponds) yet another reason for their loss other than the most obvious, which was bad leadership and bad governance. Not satisfied with abusing leaders of foreign countries, foreign organisations, our regional CARICOM, and our apex court, the Caribbean Court of Justice, the new mantra is “regime change”. The vast majority of Guyanese will find this mantra an imbecilic sermon befitting of its source.
The coalition entered office on an extremely thin majority mandate of 4,300 votes between the APNU+AFC and the PPP/C, or only 2,000 votes if the smaller parties were also accounted for, a margin of victory of 0.1%. Instead of showing Guyana that they would be the best government, they increased their salaries by 50%; broke their promises; neglected young people and young leaders; fired thousands of sugar workers; overtaxed both businesses and consumers; mismanaged the economic sectors and damaged our macroeconomic fundamentals; signed bad oil contracts; lied about and hid the US$18M signing bonus in the Exxon deal; and engaged in wasteful spending, and increased corruption.
This was all led by an aloof and oftentimes invisible President who breached the Constitution more than once and who now holds the record for the least press conferences held in 5 years (3 press conferences in total – not even one a year). As a result, the people were dissatisfied. It was, therefore, not some external plan of “regime change” which caused the APNU+AFC to lose the 2016 local government election. It was not “regime change” which made the APNU and AFC lose the 2018 local government election. It was not “regime change” which made the APNU-AFC lose the no confidence motion. In fact, most people on the street termed this government “the one-term government” and expected them to lose. The loss was not even close – it was almost 25,000 votes if the smaller parties are accounted for.
The foreign and local observers did not voice their stern position until the Mingo fraudulent declaration, which was done before their very eyes at the Ashmin’s Building. As accredited observers, given what they witnessed, they were obliged to make statements and send reports to their superiors; otherwise, it would be a dereliction of duty and possibly complicity. No shifting narrative will change what was witnessed.
Nonetheless, before seeking to awaken the dead, the APNU+AFC should start with the most obvious resurrection, which is the release of their Statements of Poll which they claim they have and show that they won the election. They can also seek to acknowledge Mingo’s fraudulent declaration which was unquestionably proven by the recount or offer an explanation for the 15,000 extra votes he found in that declaration which did not appear in the Statement of Polls and the ballot boxes when it was opened. The APNU-AFC is partially right – there will be a change of regime, but it was the voters who would have caused it and they should only blame themselves.
Yours truly,
Charles S. Ramson
Dec 04, 2024
-$1M up for grabs in 15-team tournament Kaieteur Sports- The Upper Demerara Football Association (UDFA) Futsal Year-End Tournament 2024/2025 was officially launched on Monday at the Retrieve Hard...Dear Editor The Guyana Trades Union Congress (GTUC) is deeply concerned about the political dysfunction in society that is... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- As gang violence spirals out of control in Haiti, the limitations of international... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]