Latest update April 6th, 2025 11:06 AM
Latest News
- High Court bars GRA from seizing Team Mohamed’s luxury vehicles
- Oil spill will hit Guyana’s shores before capping stack arrives to plug leak
- UN says 100 children killed or injured in Gaza every day since war resumed
- Guyana received US$605M oil money in first quarter of 2025
- ‘Tariff war’ spells grave danger for the Region – CARICOM Chair Mottley
Maybe this individual does not understand “symbolism”
DEAR EDITOR,
I use this opportunity to respond to one of your readers in relation to a letter I wrote questioning the prominent display of the Queen Victoria statue on the lawn of our High Court.
This person’s gross lack of history and historic fact is painful that one can only feel pity for his obvious ignorance as it relates to the subject matter.
First of all, Victoria had nothing whatsoever to do with the abolition of slavery. She ascended to the throne in 1837; slavery was abolished in 1834 but continued unofficially until 1838 under the guise of “Apprenticeship.”
If this person had given props to such English persons as William Wilberforce, Joseph Sturge, Thomas Clarkson, Thomas Fowler Buxton, Elizabeth Peace, Ann Knight and others, all members of the anti-slavery movement in Britain, then maybe, we could at least try to come to some meeting of the mind.
In fact, when asked to open the first Anti-Slavery Convention, Victoria politely declined, stating that as a Sovereign she could not.
It is so very sad that we cannot or would not even try to empathise or appreciate the struggles our various groups waged in order to become one people, a still distant goal in our beloved Guyana.
This person does not even seem to have an understanding of the horrors of “Indentureship” endured by his ancestors under Victoria’s rule, as if he did, he would not be as quick to jump to her defence. It was due to the concerted and persistent efforts of the aforementioned persons and others – both African and English – that my ancestors were able to throw off the physical chains of Enslavement. Now psychologically, that’s a whole new story.
There is no way that after 1834 to 2019, and particularly after 1966, we should be so honouring a symbol of our shame. Maybe this individual does not understand “symbolism.”
Respectfully,
Claudeston G. Massiah
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
This must not be our hour of humiliation
Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- There are moments in the history of nations when fate lays before them a choice not of... more
The U.S. “Joining” the Commonwealth: an unreasonable expectation
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- Recent media stories have suggested that King Charles III could “invite” the United... more
Weekend Cartoon
