Conflicting views from Govt. on GuySuCo

Nov 19, 2019 Letters

---

Dear Editor,

The GAWU saw reports appearing recently in the media regarding responses of officials from the PNCR and the AFC with regards to questions posed by the media about the wage freeze imposed on sugar workers since the Coalition took office in 2015.
While the responses by the leading officials are not identical they are very similar. If a person was reading about the state of the sugar industry for the first time, they would no doubt believe, the caretaker Government was an angel and had ‘clean hands’.
This, of course, we know is really far from the truth.
According to one report, AFC Treasurer, Dominic Gaskin, said Government should not be held responsible for the withholding of the pay rises to sugar workers. He is quoted as saying “GuySuCo is governed by a board of directors and if that Board of Directors decided that they can give a raise in pay that is entirely within their remit to do so.”
But, it was correctly pointed out that the Board is appointed by the Government and, therefore, a creature of the administration, it will be guided, obviously, by the instructions and guidance of the Government.
What’s interesting is that the GuySuCo board apparently has leeway to grant increases but other state agencies which can afford to offer pay increases in excess of what is approved for public servants must swallow hook, line and sinker the Government-imposed increases.
Why two different yardsticks we wonder? Moreover, we do not believe that the Government, if it is really concerned about the plight of sugar workers who are their employees, would not engage the Board and other GuySuCo officials in finding a way to provide the workers a pay rise.
The apparent fact that this hasn’t been done only confirms further that the Government really doesn’t care about sugar workers and their valid and varied troubles.
Mr Gaskin, we did recognize to have said that he felt “…we can all do with a raise in pay but I do not know what sugar workers earn”.
Certainly, in our view sugar workers are more than deserving and require a rise in pay.
It is sad to know that Mr Gaskin, who occupied a high-ranking Government post, is unaware of what sugar workers earnings look like.
We hasten to point out such information he can probably get by one call to his colleague Minister of Agriculture, Noel Holder.
According to the PNCR’s Chairperson, Volda Lawrence, “…all the workers of GuySuCo… they’ve never been left behind…”
It appears the PNC Chairperson did not understand the question as her sentiment is in direct and clear contrast to what the media posed.
The reality is that we are at the threshold of 2020 but sugar workers wages are stuck in 2014. Using Lawrence’s term, the sugar workers have been left behind and far behind for that matter. The Chairperson went on to say: “I’m certain that the Board of Directors would have indicated to all management who have the responsibility to speak with the workers within their domain or under their supervision about the future of GuySuCo and what they’re doing presently…”
It seems that Volda Lawrence has not been keenly following the news, though as a high ranking state official she ought to be.
Was she in sync with the news, her ‘certainty’ as she put it, would have been withheld as a meeting to discuss the industry’s long and short term strategies was abandoned when the sugar unions used the opportunity to express strongly and forthrightly the crying plight of the sugar workers.
She would also know that the GAWU has been lamenting in the media for many months that its effort to engage the GuySuCo on its future direction has not seen a reciprocal response from the Corporation.
While that is important and the union is still eagerly anticipating it would meet GuySuCo on its direction, it does not negate that sugar workers need a pay rise now and in the future as well. How does Ms Lawrence and clique expect them and their families to survive when they do not enjoy the cushy benefits that she and her colleagues, in the state, receive.
While the statements by the Coalition officials are recognized and noted, they must be seen for what they really are.
Rather than seeking to right the wrong and to bring justice to the sugar workers, they have found a scapegoat in the GuySuCo Board which they had a hand in appointing.
It’s an unconvincing excuse coming from two senior political officials in the administration. Do they really expect sugar workers to accept that excuse?
If they are then they must really think the workers are idiots.
The Government and the Coalition parties should not behave like they are unspoilt.
They have had a major hand in the state of the sugar industry.
They have ignored their own Commission of Inquiry report to not close estates. They have closed their minds to the real possibilities for the industry’s successful turnaround.
They have, without any credible examination, put 7,000 workers on the breadline.
They have disregarded the workers right to severance- an injustice corrected after the Court’s intervention.
They have borrowed billions in the name of the industry without a real plan and have mortgaged the Guyanese people assets to secure the loan.
So today, to seek to convince that they really had the sugar workers in heart and in mind is simply to add insult to injury.
Seepaul Narine
General Secretary of the GAWU

---

---