Latest update April 7th, 2025 6:08 AM
How can this difference in approach be reconciled?
DEAR EDITOR, 
With respect to the No-Confidence Voting, The APPEAL Court of Guyana has ruled in the APNU+AFC favour.
This decision seems to suggest that there is one set of RULES for Parliamentarians and another set of RULES for the rest of Guyanese in particular with respect to GECOM’s five votes where three is a majority and the APPEAL COURT’s Voting with three votes where two is the majority.
How does the Guyana Appeal Court reconcile the differences in approach used.
Had it ruled that 33 is the majority out of 65 votes casted then there would not be a need to reconcile as three would be a majority out of five GECOM votes casted and two would be the majority out of three Appellate Court Votes casted.
Yours faithfully
Sean Ori
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
Anticipation without preparation
Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- The Vice President of Guyana, ever the sagacious observer of the inevitable, has reassured... more
The U.S. “Joining” the Commonwealth: an unreasonable expectation
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- Recent media stories have suggested that King Charles III could “invite” the United... more
Weekend Cartoon
