Latest update November 28th, 2024 3:00 AM
Latest News
- $99B spent on Wales Gas plants to date, 58% of works completed – Prime Minister tells Parliament
- National Assembly clears $456M in Contingency Fund advances
- Hell and high water: Gaza waits for a ceasefire of its own
- Fire Service issues stern warning against maliciously set fires
- Miner stabbed to death during argument at ‘Honey Camp’
Guyana’s current constitutional malaise may lead to political crisis
DEAR EDITOR,
I use this opportunity to comment on the ongoing constitutional crisis which seems to have evaded the prefixed vision of several commentators across the spectrum of print media, social and discussion forums
Generally speaking, a constitutional crisis results from a political crisis which invariably centres on government officials’ promulgating and promoting activities in contravention of constitutional provisions.
At this juncture, most of us have our eyes glued to March 20 and beyond, as the commencement of constitutional malaise. This, however, may not materialize once the other constitutional provisions are followed.
Meanwhile, the ongoing constitutional crisis resulted from the ministerial plenary meetings or ghost cabinets which are attempts to resurrect the Cabinet.
While such meetings may be in order, decisions taken cannot be used in furtherance of national socio-economic/development policies and programs.
To do so would be usurping the powers vested in the Cabinet which died on December 21. Therefore, beginning with the publication of the Official Gazette on March 9, and the subsequent appointments of members to several Boards contravene the constitution, and are consequently, unlawful.
This can and may potentially transform the constitutional crisis into a sociopolitical crisis.
In essence, these and other similar acts of the APNU+AFC would be subjected to revocation by the next government for two reasons: unlawfulness, and political expediency. Given that the current government is acting in contravention of the constitution, thus unlawfully, the next government (highly likely to be PPP/C) must of necessity use the appropriate means to revoke these appointments.
Furthermore, no government would want to have their Boards and Commissions pre-stacked with opposing members, as such skewed situation could stymie national socioeconomic development/progress.
In a nutshell, while corrective actions would be necessary, doing so would likely receive a negative political spin and lead to a political and potentially socio-ethnic crisis. Notwithstanding their unlawful appointments, these members would resist removal and likely accuse the new government of “witch hunting”.
Regards,
Ronald Singh
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
The illusion of compliance
…Peeping Tom Kaieteur News- A company can meet the letter of the law. It can tick every box, hit every target. Yet,... more
Rising Gun Crimes in the Caribbean: Urgent Action required by all
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – There is an alarming surge in gun-related violence, particularly among younger... more
Weekend Cartoon
