Latest update April 6th, 2025 11:06 AM
Feb 15, 2019 News
Moves to have the Ministry of Social Protection’s Labour Department intervene in yet another industrial standoff, have reached a point where allegations are being made that the designated arbiter is lacking the needed impartial trait.
At least this is according to information shared by the University of Guyana [UG] Unions, – the University of Guyana Workers Union [UGWU] and the University of Guyana Senior Staff Association [UGSSA]. Similar sentiments were raised last year by the Guyana Teachers’ Union [GTU] during its standoff with the Ministry of Education when the latter called on the Labour Department to intervene.
In a joint statement issued by the two UG staff unions yesterday, reference was made to their attendance of a meeting Tuesday called by the Chief Labour Officer, Mr. Charles Ogle. The meeting, the unions said, was in response to a request by the UG administration.
Attending the meeting held at the Department of Labour’s Brickdam, Georgetown Office were the unions’ chairpersons [the Presidents of the unions] – Mr. Bruce Haynes [UGWU] and Dr. Jewel Thomas [UGSSA].
At the meeting, the representatives of the UG administration indicated that they wished to initiate the conciliation process. But, according to the union representatives, the meeting proved to be a most unfortunate experience for the union representatives.
“The officials of the Department of Labour did not appear to be the impartial arbiters they should have been in such a situation. The UGWU and UGSSA representatives were told that strike action is not a right action and that strike action in their [the Unions’] situation was impossible. They were also told that what had been allowed before would not be allowed again [the Unions took that to be a reference to their 2015 strike action] and that they could face disciplinary consequences for their role in leading industrial action,” the joint statement reads.
Moreover, the unions have concluded that “the behaviour manifested [during this recent] meeting was a grave disappointment.”
“We expect that officials of the Department of Labour will behave in a manner that is beyond reproach when intervening in disputes. Their conduct should be so unbiased that accusations of acting in favour of a particular political group would never arise. However, such threats will not cause us to deviate from our determined course,” the unions have
asserted.
Despite the daunting development, the unions have joined forces insisting that they will not be bullied into submission.
In fact, the unions in sharing their game-plan stated that they intend to fight to the very end for the well-being and interests of their over 1,000 full-time and part-time staffers, and also for the well-being and interests of the over 7,000 students of the University.
“As employees, as taxpayers and as citizens, we need to know that the national resources being given to the University are being spent in a way that brings the greatest good to staff and students. We would like the questions we have answered by way of a forensic audit, that will help us to determine the true financial situation of the University,” said the Unions in their joint statement.
This development comes on the heels of protest action agitated by the unions earlier this week which saw calls being made for a forensic audit into the financials of the tertiary institution.
Apr 06, 2025
-Action concludes today Kaieteur Sports- In a historic occurrence for Guyana’s Basketball fraternity the ‘One Guyana’ 3×3 Quest opened yesterday, Saturday, morning at the Cliff...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- There are moments in the history of nations when fate lays before them a choice not of... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- Recent media stories have suggested that King Charles III could “invite” the United... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]