Latest update January 29th, 2025 1:18 PM
Latest News
- “Now is the time to take more loans”-Sport Minister
- Oil-rich Guyana would be bankrupt if it gave $1M to every family – Minister Bharrat claims
- Five-year-old among two killed in Israeli attacks amid Gaza ceasefire
- Introducing biometrics without legal framework would be unconstitutional – GECOM
- Brutus wants High Court to quash PSC Tribunal
Is ‘the Peeper’ lobbing for his pocket or on a PR mission for the tobacco company?
Dear Editor,
I take umbrage to a missive by Peeping Tom, “Pesticides, tobacco and social cohesion” in KN, Nov 30th. The Peeper sought to criticize the Govt’s approach on relinquishing the VAT on pesticides and increasing the tax on cigarettes by asserting that pesticides have a more devastating effect on the population, than tobacco. The Peeper failed to give consideration to the fact that cigarette smoking is an act of choice, leading to probably addiction, while the use of pesticides by farmer is an act of necessity.
In our seemingly biblical last days scenario, the attack on crops by insects has increased. All Guyanese farmers will attest to this. Given the high price of insecticides, no farmer would use pesticides on their crop unless they are certain that their crop is threatened by insects. The objective is to save their crops and like in any other business, to reduce the cost of production. Alternatively, herbicides are used by farmers to reduce cost too.
It is clear, the Peeper has little or no knowledge of farming. While these chemicals may have damaging effects on farmers and the environment due to contact and residual effects respectively, where is the scientific cost effective alternative to replace them? Should a farmer stand and watch his crops being decimated by insects and not use insecticides to save it? The Peeper wrote. “Pesticides are no friends of farmers.”If a product can save your crops from decimation by a swarm of rampaging insects, I think it would be ungrateful not to acknowledge that product as a friend. History is laden with examples where insects had destroyed crops, causing starvation of large populations before the advent of insecticide.
The present budgetary move by the government to remove the VAT on pesticides and herbicides would be viewed by farmers as a positive help to reduce their cost of production.
The Peeper wrote, “More people die each year in Guyana from pesticide and weedicide poisoning each year than from the effects of cigarette smoking.” While that is the truth from a statistical point of view- the Peeper’s comparative analysis to smoking is flawed and misleading in context. Is the Peeper suggesting that the prevalence of pesticides and weedicides in our domain, the reason for our high suicide rate? Surely! The Peeper should know that the prevalence of suicide in our society has a deeper socio-economic rooting.
Moreover, Pesticides/weedicides are the means, not the cause of suicide. Take the chemicals away and hanging becomes the next means. Do we then ask the Govt to place a high tax on rope?
May be the Peeper is a smoker like me-lobbying for his own pocket or on a PR mission for the Tobacco Companies.
R. Singh
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
A warning to President Ali on U.S. Overtures
Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- It remains unknown what President Ali told the U.S. Secretary of State during their recent... more
OAS Secretary General Election and renewed OAS Consensus
Antiguan Barbudan Ambassador to the United States, Sir Ronald Sanders By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The upcoming election... more
Weekend Cartoon
