Latest update December 1st, 2024 4:00 AM
Latest News
- Fulcrum tells Govt. it has access to finance for gas project
- Prime Minister makes third commitment to submit Wales Gas Projects agreements to Parliament
- I am starving in Gaza and I don’t believe the world can’t do anything
- Three dead in two-car smash-up at St. Cuthbert’s Mission
- Nearly 500 protest in London for insurance companies to halt support for new oil projects
Guyana Goldfields and the Exxon backlash
Dear Editor,
It seems the political backlash of a terrible contract with Exxon is now spreading its ugly head on one of Guyana’s best managed, most accountable and transparent companies that provides more revenue to the country than sugar and indeed is the largest contributor to the Government of Guyana in terms of employment, taxes paid (corporate and payroll etc) and duties.
This is independent of the huge investment made by the company for over 10 years before finding an ounce of gold. This represents a sunken investment of over US$150 million or G$30 billion. Within this period, over 30 exploration companies were registered in Guyana, expended millions of US dollars seeking commercial deposits of resources, found nothing and left the country. That is the risk a Company assumes in the search for natural resources.
I can understand the frustration with the Exxon deal, but, what are we really doing?
Surely, our artisanal or small miners need a better concession package. This was recently done by the Government of Guyana. But let’s put everything in context.
The Mineral Agreement which governs concessions, investments, royalties, employment, environmental safeguards and duties etc. of Guyana Goldfields, was signed by President Bharrat Jagdeo in 2011. At the time, it was considered very harsh as the royalty 8% was higher than in Suriname and other mining jurisdictions.
Guyana Goldfields is a listed company. The US$150 million to invest in Guyana over a barren 10-year period was funded through the stock exchange and private capital. After gold was found in the vastness of the Cuyuni area, where transportation and logistics cost are very high and safety issues are dominant, Guyana Goldfields had to find more investors to build the mine.
It had to bring in overseas firms because the skills and technology did not exist in Guyana even though there has been mining for over 100 years in Guyana. To build the mine, significant amounts of equipment had to be imported as well as over 800 individuals with the appropriate large-scale mining skills. Also significant environmental equipment and technology had to be applied to prevent another Omai spill.
The end result was that without the concessions granted by the government, the mine would not have been feasible and there would be the loss of over 800 jobs and revenues to the government through taxes, the multiplier effect of procurement from local companies, among other revenue streams such as the taxes of employees, NIS payment, etc.
Guyana Goldfields has the best CSR Programme in Guyana by far. Its presence in Guyana has made Guyana an investment destination and has helped thousands of families to earn a livelihood in a time of severe job needs.
On the other hand, sugar has received billions of dollars from the Government with no returns over the last decade. Yet no one speaks to this but instead tries to attack Guyana’s leading company because of sour grapes with Exxon.
C. Allen
Employee Guyana Goldfields
South Amelia’s Ward, Mackenzie, Linden
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
A little room to breathe and a podium of their own!
…Peeping Tom Kaieteur News- Week after week, the General Secretary of the People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPPC)... more
Haiti: Tragically Descending into Deeper Crisis
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- As gang violence spirals out of control in Haiti, the limitations of international... more
Weekend Cartoon
