Latest update March 31st, 2025 6:44 AM

Guyana's largest selling daily and New York's most popular weekly

Latest News

Attorney/Parliamentarian takes issue with the DPP and Magistrates

Apr 28, 2017 Letters

Dear Editor,
Please allow me space in your paper for this letter to be published and also for comments/feedbacks from other interested parties to be published.
I have seen many persons appear in several courts charged with being in possession of ‘a narcotic’ for the purpose of trafficking and after pleading NOT GUILTY, the defendant is remanded to prison, bail being refused because no special reason was advanced. If the defendant pleads guilty he or she is sentenced to a term of imprisonment (3 to 5 years). Mr. Editor this has been the practice and has been so for several years.
I wish to submit that it is wrong and many persons have been wrongfully imprisoned by Magistrates who did not see the need to challenge the actual charges and /or have been too timid to dare question the charges (no disrespect intended) and I am inviting all the legal minds out there who would like to offer a comment on the very topic I am about to present, without animosity.
I will copy verbatim the charge as was laid in a particular case, without naming the defendants and/or the magistrate who were involved. The charge has been dismissed.
Statement of Offence.
Possession of narcotics for the purpose of trafficking, contrary to section 5 (1) (a) (1) of the Narcotics Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act 10 of 2010. THE DEFENDANT PLEADED “NOT GUILTY’ and was remanded to prison, where he was until the conclusion of the trial.
I will not offer any comment on the actual wording of the charge but will certainly say that at the time of the first appearance in court to answer the said charge THERE WAS NO ANALYST REPORT IN THE FILE TO DETERMINE THAT THE ALLEGED SUBSTANCE WAS, IN FACT, A NARCOTIC.
Now for the legal Luminaries out there and for those who saw nothing wrong with such a charge, and to the DPP for presenting the defendant with such a situation I ask, was it legally correct for such a situation to have been presented to the courts and worse yet, did the magistrate act in accordance with the law by refusing bail and remanding the defendant…ON A MERE SUSPICION?
I will agree that one can be arrested ‘on suspicion’ but no one should be charged on mere suspicion and then sent to prison based on that suspicion.
I will submit also that the Learned DPP ought to ensure that files are complete, with all the pertinent details in them before anyone is brought to trial for any offence.
Of course the Esteemed DPP (who has not responded to letters I wrote to her for several months now) is very busy, especially with SOCU looking at the acquisition of lands in Pradoville, but a person’s liberty ought to be taken seriously and the deprivation of his/her freedom should not be based on sloppy work on the part of a senior judicial officer.
The same can be said for a charge of being in possession of Firearm. UNLESS A GUN HAS BEEN TESTED BY A TRAINED PERSON AND A REPORT PRESENTED TO THE DPP no charge should be laid against anyone for being in possession of a firearm.
I wish to submit that the definition of a firearm should be taken seriously and studied by the police and the Learned DPP so that they can understand that a gun cannot be deemed to be a firearm unless it has been tested to so determine. There are several definitions for a firearm but I like the one that describes a firearm as…’ a gun that discharges a projectile by the process of combustion’. Again anyone can be arrested for being in possession of a gun without being the holder of a firearm licence but no one should be charged with that as an offence unless and until the said gun has been tested by an expert to determine that it is, in fact a firearm.
Sir, too many persons are suffering at the hands of the police who, very often with the knowledge of and on instructions from the Learned DPP on mere “suspicion”. No file should be presented to any court unless there is proof that an offence has been committed. Such a file should be deemed incomplete and magistrates should refuse to act on such files.
Too long this has been going on and too many persons have suffered at the hands of such incompetence and it is time this be discontinued. If the DPP is too busy with SOCU, she should look for another job because this has been going on for years before SOCU and, I submit, it is wrong.
It would be interesting to see how others feel about my comments. Maybe the DPP may find the time to offer a response.
Charrandass Persaud

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| March, 28th, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

 

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Fantastic Wharton snipes haul-trick in 11-0 win

Fantastic Wharton snipes haul-trick in 11-0 win

Mar 31, 2025

-as Santa Rosa finish atop of Group ‘B’ Kaieteur Sports- Five thrilling matches concluded the third-round stage of the 2025 Milo/Massy Boys’ Under-18 Football Tournament yesterday at the...
Read More
Back Circle bests Gold is Money to retain crown

Back Circle bests Gold is Money to retain crown

Mar 31, 2025

DCC continues winning ways thanks to Imlach masterclass

DCC continues winning ways thanks to Imlach...

Mar 31, 2025

All-round Headquarters retain title in dominant fashion

All-round Headquarters retain title in dominant...

Mar 31, 2025

Yarrowkabra smashes four in Tutorial, as Dolphin, Waramuri Sec’ remain unbeaten

Yarrowkabra smashes four in Tutorial, as Dolphin,...

Mar 30, 2025

Ramesh Chattergoon smacks 110* in ESCL T20, Over-40

Ramesh Chattergoon smacks 110* in ESCL T20,...

Mar 30, 2025

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.

Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]