Latest update February 23rd, 2025 1:40 PM
Jan 25, 2017 Letters
DEAR EDITOR,
The Tuesday 24th January, 2017 edition of the Kaieteur News contains an article under the caption “Banks DIH sues GRA for $28.5 billion.” In that article a statement is attributed to former Attorney General Anil Nandlall, chronicling the history of the Consumption tax dispute between Demerara Distillers Limited and the Guyana Revenue Authority dating back to 2001.
After correctly recounting that the Court of Appeal upheld DDL’s challenge to the GRA’s assessment of its tax liability, and prescribed a formula to calculate that liability, the article reports Mr. Nandlall’s statement to the effect that, in 2009, the GRA again assessed DDL, this time using the Court’s recommended formula, which second assessment was also challenged in Court by DDL.
Mr. Nandlall is quoted as criticizing the Government for its failure “to defend GRA’s assessment done in accordance with the Court of Appeal’s formula.”
It becomes necessary to point out that the premise of this statement attributed to Mr. Nandlall is false. In fact, DDL’s claim in Court was that the GRA’s assessment violated the Court of Appeal formula, and this was a live issue between the parties. The article also does not point out that the second assessment was made two years after the Consumption Act which permitted such assessments had been repealed, so that there was no authority to make the assessment at all.
Miles Fitzpatrick, S.C.
Timothy Jonas
Feb 23, 2025
Kaieteur Sports- The battle lines are drawn. One Guyana Racing Stable is here to make history. With the post positions set for the 2025 Sandy Lane Barbados Gold Cup, all eyes are on Guyana’s rising...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- The folly of the cash grant distribution is a textbook case of what happens when a government,... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- A rules-based international trading system has long been a foundation of global commerce,... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]