Latest update February 8th, 2025 6:23 PM
Latest News
- Soaring gold price entices Canadian company to renew permits in Guyana
- Terrence Campbell accuses Govt. of weaponizing Police Force after calls for accountability with oil revenues
- China slams US as Panama quits Belt and Road Initiative
- Guyana extradites fugitive to Canada
- AFC Leader Nigel Hughes welcomes any investigation into lands he acquired
Bartica Massacre… Police detective recounts statements given by accused
Bartica massacre Police Detective, Suraj Singh, yesterday recounted to the
court his portion of evidence in which he reiterated the statements given by the three men accused of slaughtering 12 persons at Bartica in February 200.
The three accused, Mark Royden Williams, called Durant and Smallie; Dennis Williams called Anaconda; and Roger Anthony Simon, called ‘Goat Man’ are on trial before Justice Roxanne George and a mixed 12-member jury at the High Court in Georgetown.
According to the allegation Sunday, February 17, 2008, the men were among a number of gunmen who attacked the mining community of Bartica, Essequibo, killing 12 residents.
Among the deceased were Lance Corporal Zaheer Zakir, Constable Shane Fredericks and Constable Ron Osborne; Edwin Gilkes, Abdool Yassin Jr, Deonarine Singh, Errol Thomas, Ronald Gomes, Baldeo Singh, Ashraf Khan, Irving Ferreira and Dexter Adrian.
After murdering the police officers, the gang is said to have stolen cash, arms, ammunition and a vehicle from the police station. Using the stolen police vehicle, they drove through the streets of Bartica shooting at civilians.
They proceeded to CBR Mining, where they stole arms and ammunition, and removed two safes containing cash and gold. After their one-hour rampage, the gunmen departed Bartica by boat.
Yesterday, Detective Singh told the court that constable Chester Benjamin pointed out Roger Simon, during an identification parade, some time after the incident.
The witness recalled that Benjamin identified Simon as one of the men, who attacked the Bartica Police Station in February 2008.
Singh recalled that Simon responded to the allegations by the saying, “Boss man me ain’t understand. What’s going on?”
He said that on April 8, 2008, the accused was cautioned and the allegation of murder was put to him.
This time, he related to the court that Simon was told that he was in the company of others who shot and killed 12 persons at Bartica, Essequibo, on February 17, 2008.
In response to the allegation, he said, Simon stated, “Boss man I was in the interior working. Me ain’t know nothing about this. Me ain’t know what going on…”
Singh said, too, that the suspect (Simon) declined to give a written statement to the police on the matter.
He recounted that he therefore made an entry of the man’s oral statement in the station diary.
The officer noted that no threats, promises, or inducements were offered to the accused for him to give the statements
The Policeman testified to taking the statements from the other two accused persons, Mark Royden Williams and Dennis Williams.
Both of whom, he recalled gave oral statements on the incident.
In relation to Mark Royden Williams, Officer Singh said that after he was picked out by Policeman Carl Methuram, on an identification parade, he was cautioned and the allegation of murder was put to him.
The witness noted that Williams had responded by saying is “Saddest (Rondell ‘Fine Man’ Rawlins) come and I had to go.”
The accused however declined to say anything further. “Me nah mek no more statement, man.”
The policeman recalled that he cautioned the accused in accordance with the Judge’s rules before he gave the oral statement.
He had also asked Williams if he wanted anyone present at the time of the statement but he replied in the negative.
Detective Singh said that some time afterwards, the other accused, Dennis Williams was cautioned and the allegation of murder was put to him in relation to the Bartica incident.
The witness said that Dennis Williams told detectives that he was at Bartica but he didn’t kill anyone.
The Policeman‘s evidence followed the testimony of Government Pathologist Dr Nehaul Singh. Dr Singh committed a post mortem examination on all 12 persons, who were murdered in the massacre.
In his testimony, the pathologist revealed that the victims died as a result of the gunshot injuries they sustained.
Based on the information gathered from the autopsy, Dr Singh noted that some of the victims were shot at close range while others were shot to the head and other vital parts of their body, making their chance of survival very small.
Dr Singh noted that his examinations revealed that the victims of the massacre sustained multiple gunshot wounds.
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
Due diligence on investments must become a priority
Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- In 1985, the Forbes Burnham government looking for economic salvation, entered into a memorandum... more
OAS Secretary General Election and renewed OAS Consensus
Antiguan Barbudan Ambassador to the United States, Sir Ronald Sanders By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The upcoming election... more
Weekend Cartoon
