Latest update January 28th, 2025 12:59 AM
Nov 18, 2015 Letters
Dear Editor,
It was disturbing to learn, according to a report in the November 4, 2015 edition of Stabroek News, that GuySuCo’s CEO advised that the Corporation failed to produce about 6,000 tonnes sugar arising from the sugar workers three (3) day protest action. The goodly gentleman, who has worked for many years in sugar, could not have been factual as he is fully well aware that the disclosure is misleading. The 3- day strike was from Sunday to Tuesday. It is a known fact that even in the best of times, turnout of harvesters on Sundays is less than 50% of a normal weekday turnout. It means that the CEO was alluding to almost 2,000 tonnes sugar being produced per day, including Sunday. Let the CEO point to any Sunday in the life of GuySuCo where 2,000 tonnes sugar was produced, or let him point to anytime that 6,000 tonnes were produced between Sunday and Tuesday of any week. How could the company fail to produce the sugar given that the canes remained in cultivation? Additionally, it is GuySuCo that boasted perpetually in the past about “solid canes in the ground” whenever they could not achieve production levels due to their own mismanagement. However, it appears that the “solid cane in the ground” principle does not apply in the case of protest action. The hullabaloo lacks any basis and cannot withstand scrutiny.
The CEO is also reported to have said that the industry lost a further $38M arising from stale canes that either were discarded or deteriorated due to the workers action. This like his previous assertion cannot hold water. Can the CEO advise the public whether any canes were discarded and if so where? If there weren’t any discard of canes, he needs to provide empirical data that supports the extent of deterioration that resulted in 438 tonnes sugar being lost. It is known that the factories process canes which have been burnt for over ten (10) days even though the sugar recovery is not 100 per cent. Certainly canes burnt for about 3 to 4 days are still prime for sugar conversion. Is it that the CEO is being “intellectually dishonest”?
I also noticed that the Corporation disclosed that during the strike it utilized diesel costing some $12.6M to maintain its factories. Using a price of $163 per litre for diesel, it meant that GuySuCo consumed about 77,300 litres of diesel during the strike period. The article, however, made mention 3,000 liters per factory per day i.e. 63,000 litres over the period. Is it that GuySuCo is purchasing diesel above market price or deliberately inflated its diesel consumption upon instruction from someone? GuySuCo needs to explain.
Why does the top brass of the Corporation’s Management Team submit that the recent GAWU three (3) day strike was more effective than it was? Such portrayal is not in the interest of the Corporation.
Clearly, the credibility of the Corporation and the genuineness of their statements are under doubt in my view. The GuySuCo, through its reported statements, has inflicted further insult to the injuries already suffered by the sugar workers.
Alvin Pereira
Jan 28, 2025
Kaieteur Sports – The Guyana Tennis Association (GTA) commends the Government of Guyana (GOG) for its significant increase in funding to the sports sector in the 2025 National budget. This...– spending US$2B on a project without financial, environmental studies is criminality at its worst – WPA Kaieteur... more
Antiguan Barbudan Ambassador to the United States, Sir Ronald Sanders By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The upcoming election... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]