Why would the authorities shoot itself in its own foot

Sep 16, 2015 Letters

Dear Editor,
I left the country just as the Government was launching their gun amnesty program. I came back last weekend, anxious to find out how the venture was progressing. I have seen this kind of gun amnesty and gun buy-back work in several countries where I have lived and traveled to, including the USA and Canada.
However, as I listened intently to the summations from recently held press conference on the gun amnesty, I heard that it is decided that there will be ballistics tests conducted on all weapons and ammunition handed in to ascertain whether they are linked to any crimes and that further, they will be amnesty on the possession of the illegal weapon but not for crimes committed using the weapons.
And this, Editor, is where I was taken aback. Why would the authorities, in the middle of an amnesty drive, divulge information that is likely to stymie the drive? What should have been the highlight of that press conference is the lauding and praising of those who would have taken the bold steps of doing the right thing and returning those weapons. There should have been a clarion cry for such behaviours to be emulated.
However, the message has now been blurred with the suggestion that there are likely to be arrests and imprisonments, related to the said amnesty. It is very likely that criminals, or the friends and family of criminals are the ones turning in the guns and ammunitions. Why then would the authorities publicly announce that it is likely that the very person who is making use of the amnesty might probably be arrested for a related crime?
I am not saying that ballistics tests should not be conducted on the weapons and ammunition, neither am I suggesting that there should be amnesty for any related crimes. I am just wondering why the authorities – in the middle of the drive – would do even the slightest thing to proverbially shoot itself in its own foot.
We saw the same approach to the Shawn Hinds situation, where right in the middle of Hind’s bombshell confessions, it was said that he will not benefit from such confessions and divulgence.
I am convinced that there is something that the politicians and public security personnel know in Guyana that my years of training and dealing with similar situations have not yet revealed to me. But I am sure that the current administration has the best possible advisors available to them, so I continue to sit on the sidelines, as I carefully observe and learn.
I do hope, for the sake of the safety of all Guyanese, that this amnesty nets a huge portion of the guns used to inflict grievous bodily harm and even death. I also pray that the reluctance to engage criminals in any kind of quid-pro-quo (something for something) or plea bargaining, work to the advantage of the security personnel in Guyana and aids in the reduction of crime.
Pastor W. P. Jeffrey

Latest News

Why would the authorities shoot itself in its own foot

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show | December, 2nd, 2024

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Thomas’ hat-trick inspires D.C Caesar Fox 10-5 victory, as Annai...

Stabroek Ballers, Sparta Boss, Bent Street...

West Indies Falter in Disheartening Series Loss...

Trophy Stall hands over trophies for Kennard...

Omari Glasgow, carrying the hopes and dreams of a...

GCF eyeing growth across other regions in 2025...

Features/Columnists

The stakes are high in Guyana’s democracy

Let the asylum seekers go: a first step for Venezuela to rebuild relations in the Americas

A leader undresses in public

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]

Why would the authorities shoot itself in its own foot

Share this:

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show | December, 2nd, 2024

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]