Latest update February 3rd, 2025 7:00 AM
Latest News
- Govt. assures Exxon not hiding true oil data
- Sheriff Holdings distances self from convicted fraudster Ed Ahmad over suspicious Ogle land deal
- Trump says Americans could feel ‘pain’ in trade war with Mexico, Canada, China
- Soesdyke man killed after car crashes into truck
- Patterson pillories govt. for reckless spending of oil money
Summons filed to have PPP/C Elections Petition thrown out
PPP/C member Ganga Persaud
Attorney- at- law, Roysdale Forde, has filed a summons in the High Court, requesting that the petition which seeks to challenge the outcome of the recently held General and Regional elections, be struck out.
The elections petition was filed on behalf of PPP/C member, Ganga Persaud, on June 23 last. According to the document, Persaud and members of the former government are questioning the validity of the May 11 polls which declared the APNU+AFC Government winners.
Persaud named the Chief Elections Officer, Keith Lowenfield, and leaders of the eight political parties, which contested in the last elections as respondents, in the matter.
In the petition, Persaud, who was appointed Election Agent of the List of Candidates for the PPP/C, claimed that the elections were “unlawfully conducted” and the result of the elections was affected or might have been affected by unlawful acts or omissions.
He underscored that the elections were not held in conformity with the Constitution of Guyana and the Representation of the People Act, Chapter 1:03.
As such, opposition essentially requested a recount of all ballot boxes for the last elections and fresh elections were also called for.
However, in a summons filed on behalf of Chief Elections Officer, last month, Attorney-at-law Roysdale Forde requested that the elections petition be struck out, on the grounds that sections of the petition failed to disclose reasonable cause of action and are frivolous and vexatious.
The summons followed a request by Attorneys representing respondents in the matter, for further and better particulars specified in paragraphs 8 subparagraphs 1- 15, of the petition.
According to the document, those paragraphs must be struck as they are in breach of sections 140 (2) of the representation of the People’s Act Cap: 1:03.
The summons also outlined that the claims in paragraphs 8 subparagraphs 1- 15, of the petition failed to provide facts to support the claims that the elections was rigged.
The PPP/C had claimed that the entire electoral process was flawed. It contained many procedural errors and instances of fraudulent and/or suspicious actions.
“Unrest, fake statements of polls (SOPs) and multiple voting were among several causes cited when the PPP/C filed its elections petition.”
The presence of “huge mobs” at several polling stations and other strategic places, particularly in Region Four, were also cited by the party as another cause for intimidation and fear which in turn “rendered it impossible for polling and counting agents, duly appointed candidates to carry out their duties and functions properly.
However, based on a request by the party for further and better particulars, Attorney -at –law, Anil Nandlall, filed an affidavit in response.
Nandlall is representing Persaud and the PPP/C in the matter. In the affidavit, the attorney asserted that the particulars provided in the election petition were sufficient for the respondents to ascertain the case against them.
“I am unable to provide any further details without an examination of the elections papers and documents which are, by law, in the possession of the Chief Elections Officer. I request this Honourable Court that it conducts a scrutiny of votes cast,”the document stated.
Nandlall in a subsequent summons requested an order directed to the Chief Election Officer.
He requested that Lowenfield produces for inspection and examination for the purpose of the Election Petition, the parcels of all election papers and documents, including those he received from the returning officer of each electoral division under section 102 of the Representation of the Peoples Act .
This, the document stated, includes all the electoral list containing the names of the persons entitled to vote , all issued a ballots , all unused ballots , all votes cast by electors , all statement of poll issued at specified polling divisions; all certificates of counting issued in respect to the votes cast at each and every polling division, and all polling books used at each and every polling station .
While there has been no mention of which Judge will preside over the hearing, all parties concerned in the matter are scheduled to convene at the Georgetown High Court, on September 24, for reports into the matter.
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
The PPP/C’s greatest liability
Peeping Tom Kaieteur News- One might have expected that a ruling party basking in the largesse of oil wealth would chart... more
OAS Secretary General Election and renewed OAS Consensus
Antiguan Barbudan Ambassador to the United States, Sir Ronald Sanders By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The upcoming election... more
Weekend Cartoon
