Latest update March 25th, 2025 7:08 AM
Apr 21, 2015 News
As if it is not already facing enough financial problems, management of the troubled Berbice Bridge on Sunday waived tolls for scores of vehicles heading to an Albion rally of the ruling People’s Progressive Party/Civic (PPP/C).
Motorists travelling to Berbice were reportedly asked by staff if they were heading to the rally which reportedly drew an enormous crowd. The ones that answered in the affirmative were waved through while others were reportedly charged the normal tolls.
Yesterday, Kaieteur News made contact with the Berbice Bridge Company Incorporated and an official confirmed that vehicles were indeed allowed through.
However, he would not discuss where the orders to waive tolls came from. Attempts to speak with Omadat Samaroo, Chief Executive Officer, proved futile yesterday.
Kaieteur News was also unable to determine how much the Berbice Bridge would have lost in revenues because of the waiving of those tolls.
The Opposition has been complaining about the use of state assets by the ruling party to campaign for the upcoming May 11 General and Regional Elections, which is being described by observers as one of the toughest for the ruling which took power in 1992.
The Opposition A Partnership For National Unity plus Alliance For Change coalition (APNU+AFC), were not extended the same courtesy by the Berbice bridge during their recent rallies.
The Berbice Bridge itself has been facing problems. It had reportedly written
the National Insurance Scheme (NIS), a shareholder, indicating that it is unable to pay dividends for last year. Also said to have shares in the bridge are the Hand-in-Hand Insurance Company, New Building Society, Demerara Distillers Limited, Beharry Group of Companies, Queens Atlantic Investment Inv (QAII), owned by Dr. Ranjisinghi ‘Bobby’ Ramroop, best friend of former President Bharrat Jagdeo.
NIS, although sitting on billions of reserve, is facing long-term problems if it does not raise the number of contributions from employers and their workers. Currently, its expenses outstrip revenues.
The investments in the US$40M-plus Berbice Bridge had been argued as a wonderful opportunity for NIS to earn some more revenues, its managers and Government said.
It would be hard for the Berbice Bridge and its management to explain the waiving of the tolls especially when it could not pay NIS its dividends on the $950M investments made by the scheme.
In a letter to the NIS, the bridge said last year that it did not record a profit in 2014.
Chartered accountant/lawyer, Christopher Ram, had complained that while the Bridge Company claims that it had not made profits, it has failed to file its 2012 and 2013 annual returns as required by law.
Ram wrote on his online blog, chrisram.net earlier this year that based on calculations, it would appear that the tide is going out on the Bridge Company and it is leaving the NIS adrift.
“With its high borrowings, liquidity dangers for the Bridge Company are never too far from the surface. This concern is not helped by the improperly prepared financial statements such as the word “maturity” in relation to the repayment of more than $5,575 million in corporate bonds.”
He believed that the “unwillingness” by directors to file the annual reports of the company for more than two years may have something to do with the poor state of their finances.
Mar 25, 2025
Kaieteur Sports- With just 11 days to go before Guyana welcomes 16 nations for the largest 3×3 basketball event ever hosted in the English-speaking Caribbean, excitement is building. The Guyana...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- The solemnity of Babu Jaan, a site meant to commemorate the life and legacy of Dr. Cheddi... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders For decades, many Caribbean nations have grappled with dependence on a small number of powerful countries... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]