Latest update February 23rd, 2025 1:40 PM
Feb 04, 2015 News
…taxpayers to face burden of the repayment process – Party member
Members of the Alliance For Change (AFC) yesterday protested outside the Guyana Geology and Mines Commission (GGMC)’s Brickdam, Georgetown offices over the recently-approved $3 billion-dollar loan to the Central Housing and Planning Authority (CH&PA).
Fueling the controversy, is the fact that the $3B used by the Commission was not approved by Parliament and acquired through the Consolidated Fund, as is the procedure for state agencies like GGMC.
The Commission had indicated, last Thursday, via a joint statement with the Housing Authority, that a $3B Loan Agreement was signed.
Those present at yesterday’s demonstration were in consensus that the act was a clear violation of the policies which govern the agency.
Since signing the Loan Agreement, GGMC has come under intense criticism from members of the Opposition. Member of Parliament and leader of A Partnership for National Unity, David Granger, recently expressed that approval was not only out of order but outside the law.
Yesterday’s demonstration saw participants picketing with placards reading “First it was CLICO, now it is GGMC”, “GGMC is operating a slush fund for the PPP”, “Stop lending the people’s money to the PPP” and “GGMC cannot pay their own workers but lending the PPP 3 billion dollars.”
Executive member of the AFC, Neilson McKenzie, called the Commission’s approval of the $3B loan an act of “blatant hypocrisy”, especially coming off the recent industrial action by GGMC workers.
For several weeks GGMC employees picketed the Commission, demanding approval for negotiations for salary and wages increases. An agreement was recently met, with strikes being called off.
McKenzie further stated that his party feels strongly that the $3B loan should be rescinded as the act was a “cleverly designed scheme to support the PPP (People’s Progressive Party) in the ignominious pursuit of foul play”.
“(It is absurd) to think that the GGMC just recently announced that they could not pay their workers a livable wage”, said the AFC executive member, “and this same entity has determined very quickly that they have the money to lend PPP propaganda and contribute to the electoral machinery.”
Meanwhile, social activist Frederick Kissoon compared the Commission’s loan approval to that of National Industrial and Commercial Investments Limited (NICIL)’s acquisition of funds to facilitate the building of the Marriott Hotel.
Kissoon said that in both instances, NICIL and GGMC bypassed the necessary legal procedure – that is, seeking approval from Parliament to access the Consolidated Fund – to conduct their respective expenditures.
Instead, he explained, the money was taken, in the case of GGMC, directly from the Commission to the Housing Ministry, while Parliament is under prorogation, thus making the $3B loan unconstitutional.
To that effect, Kissoon further stated that stakeholders and the opposition parties should fight against such action, as he described it as an “election maneuver that is based on illegality.”
In the end, such unconstitutional action, according to Ivan Bentham of the AFC’s Georgetown Committee, will be a burden for taxpayers whom he said will face the bulk of the repayment process.
“People should worry, because it is taxpayers’ money that is being used to conduct the unconstitutional transaction,” Bentham stressed “and taxpayers will be burdened with repayment.”
Feb 23, 2025
Kaieteur Sports- The battle lines are drawn. One Guyana Racing Stable is here to make history. With the post positions set for the 2025 Sandy Lane Barbados Gold Cup, all eyes are on Guyana’s rising...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- The folly of the cash grant distribution is a textbook case of what happens when a government,... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- A rules-based international trading system has long been a foundation of global commerce,... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]