For how much longer will the exploited class on the sugar belt bear the burden?

Aug 21, 2014 Letters

DEAR EDITOR,
Once upon a time the WPA wrote in one of its pamphlets that:
“Nationalisation, with an anti-democratic state structure and an increasing managerial bureaucracy under the control of the ruling party, has put the political rulers in a position analogous to that of the former expatriate owners. Their use of state resources, privileges and facilities stamp them as a bourgeoisie of a new type, occupying with increased license the gap left by foreign business managers. Continuing control of the state gives the new rulers the juridical base from which they seize the social surplus to divert it not only to personal consumption but to private accumulation with the aim of building their type of capitalism.”
That statement of wisdom against the then Burnham Government, if fused today with the brand of governance being practiced by the Jagdeo/Ramotar cabal, exposes that even though much has changed superficially since 1979 to now, in principle nothing has changed when it comes to the governance of Guyana. I observed the PPP appointment to the Guysuco Board of Directors and I am amazed at how obtuse these politicians in charge of the PPP can be?
I have nothing personal against any of the members of the Guysuco board, but clearly the Kaieteur News headline said it all, “…new Chairman but old members remain”.
Guysuco is where it is principally because of the lack of critical exposure of the executive adventurism that was allowed to take place because a certain President was hell bent on having a certain Chinese company with very limited experience, build the Skeldon sugar factory. These old members never objected to this offence, so why put them back to do more of the same?
Several Guysuco board members, from as far back as 1999, failed to play their role and meaningfully participate in the decision-making process at the highest levels. Rather they allowed that “institution of executive dictatorship”, to use the resources of Guysuco and by extension the taxpayers, to transform himself into a full-fledged “bourgeoisie-in-chief”.
How can we expect the same set of “duck eggs” to produce “a swan” tomorrow? (I have ultimate respect for the competence and work of Dr. Permaul and thus will want to exclude him from this letter and all of its categorizations). The buck stops at the President’s desk and what he has done here reveals that he is having some serious epochs of policy paralysis. So what does he do; more of the same! Where are the agricultural researchers, the workers’ representatives, the agricultural engineers, people who really know the industry financially?
Secondly, Guysuco needs a full-time Chairman who goes to work every day at Guysuco, because the turnaround plan needs active and competent leadership interventions. This is necessary, especially in light of the fact that the CEO is furthest from being the most skilled, talented and qualified candidate to increase the yields, enforce the cost control measures and bring greater efficiency to bear in the industry. Nothing personal against Shaik Baksh, but he should make a choice, GWI or Guysuco, since I think he does have the core competence to do one or the other, but not both.
These appointments reveal that the PPP is focused on denying the working class any meaningful participation in the future of Guysuco, although they are most critical to its success. What I see happening here today, as the WPA saw in the PNC in 1979, is the PPP trying to use Guysuco to seize the economic surplus from the economy for the private enrichment of a few in the cabal. These acts must be attacked and stopped. It is the duty of the stakeholders, including the unions (GAWU and NAACIE) to bring to the attention of the workers, the reasons for the abysmal situation on the sugar belt and point out the true reasons for their economic and social conditions. Guysuco is now a pass-through agency for billions of dollars which this 10th Parliament continues to flood into the Corporation. However, very little of the money stays in the industry, but rather flows to fill the private pockets of a selected few in the PPP or some close to the top of the PPP. For how much longer will the exploited class on the sugar belt bear the burden of paying for the blunders of ruling class in the PPP?
Sase Singh

Latest News

For how much longer will the exploited class on the sugar belt bear the burden?

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| March, 31st, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Saints and GTI dominate as YBG Georgetown Regional Conference...

Carty misses ton, Hamilton (80) sets up tense...

Annandale Sec’ dominates latest fixtures in...

GPF FC to tackle Slingerz tomorrow as GFF Elite...

Permaul’s Trading & Distribution joins...

All set for Rotary Club of NA Childhood Obesity...

Features/Columnists

The reciprocal tariffs

The U.S. “Joining” the Commonwealth: an unreasonable expectation

Tariffs – American game, American imagination

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]

For how much longer will the exploited class on the sugar belt bear the burden?

Share this:

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| March, 31st, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]