Latest update April 21st, 2025 5:30 AM
Aug 04, 2014 Letters
Dear Editor,
We are in the middle of some major problems, where our education is concerned. I am going through the report (in one of the dailies), titled: “Systems in place to deal with poor Math, English performers.” And I am bothered by the very first few opening lines.
The excerpt states that “ Students who ‘would have’ failed Mathematics and English at the 2014 National Grade Six Assessment (NGSA) will not be ignored or neglected, as the Education Ministry is presently putting systems in place to help them.”
So I am left with a question: Did some students fail? The writer is saying ‘would have failed’ and this implies that the failure never took place.
People in the media need to realize that if I overslept this morning, then so be it. There is no way to say that I ‘would have overslept’ and whatever else; a fact remains so and must be treated like that in the English Language (for us here).
I recall hearing that the Mighty Chief ‘would have won’ the crown; this says that he never won it. The ‘would have’ followed by the past participle refers to what never took place. For example, I would have been in Georgetown, if (and I state my explanation. Brazil lost the World Cup semi final to Germany; not Brazil would have lost…; and I keep hearing and reading this all the time.
The second thing has to do with the words of the Minister of Education. I go to the actual statement: “First off, let me say that no child has failed this examination (NGSA).
Every student who sat this examination has been placed at a school, so no one child has failed and that is the good thing about the examination.” The question I have is what percentage has been set as a pass mark. I can pass an exam if the percentage required stands at 25. So this blanket statement needs a revisit.
Lastly, we really need to examine remedial strategies. We need the remedial sessions but for many people, the whole thing falls apart. We make the mistake of ‘forcing too much’ on slow learners, hoping they will catch up.
Actually, slower learners are not easy to handle. They call for a specialized kind of approach and many teachers can only handle normal and fast learners. These teachers falsely have the idea that they are good teachers because of the results. Normal and fast learners rarely pose serious challenge to teachers.
Matt Singh
Apr 21, 2025
– Roberts, Persaud and Anderson in 800m finals today Kaieteur Sports- Ebo McNeil’s bronze medal in the Boys’ 3000m was Guyana’s only podium finish on day two of this year’s CARIFTA...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- The Guyana Police Force (GPF) is in the throes of a chronic manpower crisis. It is no secret... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has signaled a genuine willingness to hear the Caribbean... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]