Latest update November 14th, 2024 8:42 PM
Jul 16, 2014 Letters
Dear Editor,
Ambassador Hardt’s publicly urging the Guyana Government to hold long overdue elections has met with a lot of condemnation from official government sources; and notably also from retired Attorney General Ramson and Justice Pollard.
The government claims that the Ambassador’s public urging (as opposed to the same thing done privately) is an attack on the nation’s sovereignty, namely, it amounts to interference in the internal affairs of the State. Note: this is not the same thing as “forced” or armed intervention.
What is this doctrine called Sovereignty? Where did it originate? Has its application and meaning changed over the last 350 years? It all started with the signing of the Peace of Westphalia treaty in 1648 that ended the Thirty Years’ War. What became known as the “Westphalian sovereignty” doctrine provides for three bedrock principles – one of them is the non-intervention of one state in the internal affairs of another state.
However, both the idea of Westphalian sovereignty and its applicability in practice have been questioned from the mid-20th century onwards from a variety of viewpoints. Much of the debate has turned on the ideas of internationalism and globalization which, in various interpretations, appear to conflict with Westphalian sovereignty.
In 1998, NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana said that “humanity and democracy” were two principles that directly contradict the original Westphalian Sovereignty doctrine, and further said that the latter has its limits. It also leads not to community of states – but to exclusion and isolation.
In 1999 former British PM Tony Blair gave a speech where he “set out a new, post-Westphalian doctrine of international community”. He also argued that globalization had made the Westphalian approach anachronistic. Several world leaders have also asserted that globalization has superseded the original meaning of the Westphalian Sovereignty doctrine.
Simply stated, if Governments are going to brandish the original Wesphalian idea of Sovereignty – as the government is doing – then that government is looking for excuses to lower its conduct of humanitarian standards and debase the universal idea of democracy.Publicly chiding a recalcitrant government for failing to hold local government elections for 20-years is a very reasonable and acceptable thing to do in a globalized world, in democratic environments and among a community of nations in the post Cold War era.
The behaviour of the government and its resistance to an Ambassador’s publicly calling for Constitutionally sanctioned Local government elections should frighten all decent Guyanese because it reminds you so much of the Burnham government’s resistance to free and fair elections for more than two decades.
Attorney General Ramson and Justice Pollard are hewing to old interpretations and practices of concepts and doctrines. Do they realize the consequences of their public arguments? It is that a would-be dictator can usurp power, set-up a dictatorship – and the diplomatic community and foreign governments should feel constrained by 350-year old doctrines and say nothing, do nothing.
Mike Persaud
Nov 14, 2024
Kaieteur Sports- As excitement builds for Saturday’s kickoff, Guyana Beverage Inc. through its Koolkidz brand has joined the roster of sponsors supporting the Petra Organisation’s MVP...…Peeping Tom Kaieteur News- Planning has long been the PPP/C government’s pride and joy. The PPP/C touts it at rallies,... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – There is an alarming surge in gun-related violence, particularly among younger... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]