Latest update December 19th, 2024 3:22 AM
Apr 18, 2014 Letters
Dear Editor,
I took deep interest in the arguments and deliberations put forward by all three sides of the house in the recently concluded budget debate. It is noteworthy to mention that the opposition has once again had the opportunity to examine, challenge and in some cases cut both the capital and current expenditure estimates of the budget.
However, what has disappointed me again, is that the opposition has not appeared to have conducted a similarly thorough review of the revenue side of the budget. While the AFC has indeed brought to our attention the ‘siphoning off’ of approximately $50B from the consolidated fund by the government from the income side through various state agencies and NICIL, more needs to be done (It is important to highlight that it was the PPP, prior to 1992, which made similar objections to then PNC administration on the misuse of the consolidated fund).
So when the opposition cuts the expenditure side of the budget, there becomes a surplus on the income side, or a smaller budget deficit. As a consequence, the opposition should have thought of and proposed actions or activities to utilise this excess income or attempt to reallocate this extra revenue. Such actions, albeit not easy to convince the government, could include some of the ideas they themselves have mentioned over the years, and in their manifestos. This way, the electorate clearly sees what the opposition would have done if they were in office and gives the ordinary citizen something to look forward to in the budget, rather than seeing so many capital projects which have little or no benefit to the ordinary man or woman, such as the CJIA, road expansion and Amaila Hydro. If the government attempts to disregard the opposition proposals, the electorate will see the true vested interest of the government of using the poor people’s votes to help the rich few!
Now that the budget has been cut by $37 billion on the expenditure side, much of this massive excess income on the revenue side of the budget could easily address some of the measures the opposition has mentioned in the past, such as increasing the old age pension to a livable amount of $15,000 monthly, reducing the income tax rate from 30% to 25% charged on those employed (bearing in mind this group is the most burdened ever since the implementation of the VAT of 16%), making secondary school examination fees a tax deductible, reduce both commerical and non-commercial (manufacturing) corporate taxes, and subsidizing the Berbice River Bridge toll.
These measures would provide a more balanced approach to the budget and give the electorate a chance of having real benefits, especially when one considers the perks, the array of benefits and super-salaries of some staff employed by the Office of the President and some Ministers who’s total packages amount to over $1Million a month, while the former president is awash in over $3million in pension! Further, these actions on the revenue side would reduce the government’s ability to illegally spend the uncut revenue!
Ramesh Persaud
Dec 19, 2024
Fifth Annual KFC Goodwill Int’l Football Series Kaieteur Sports-The 2024 KFC Under-18 International Goodwill Football Series, which is coordinated by the Petra Organisation, continued yesterday at...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- In any vibrant democracy, the mechanisms that bind it together are those that mediate differences,... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – The government of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela has steadfast support from many... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]