Latest update January 12th, 2025 3:54 AM
Mar 27, 2014 Letters
DEAR EDITOR,
By now, most of your readers are familiar with the venom that is spewed almost on a daily basis in the Freddie Kissoon Column. Why this man is allowed to poison the minds of your readers is as mysterious as the person who conducted the ridiculous poll that suggests “former President Bharrat Jagdeo is the one most favoured to be the PPP/C presidential candidate for the next general elections” (Guyana Chronicle, March 20).
It is ludicrous to believe that this “poll” was ever conducted at all. As a matter of fact, I am convinced that this “poll” is fabricated to cause mischief within the PPP/C. It will not succeed.
Bharrat Jagdeo is barred by the Constitution of Guyana from ever becoming President again. Therefore, to invoke his name with others in a poll question to determine “who is most favoured to be the PPP/C Presidential candidate for the next general election”, clearly shows ignorance of the Constitution. And for anyone to suggest that this so-called “poll” was conducted by the “combined Opposition” must be new to the world of politics. No opposition party or combined opposition would release the findings of a internal poll that clearly shows results unfavourable to them.
Does anyone believe that Khemraj Ramjattan would agree to release the embarrassing findings of a poll that shows if a snap election is called now, his party, the AFC, would only secure 7% of the votes – less than the “undecided”? I don’t think so. And would David Granger release the findings of a poll that gives APNU 37% of the votes compared to 46% for the PPP/C in an upcoming election?
Even Freddie Kissoon cannot believe David Granger would be so naïve.
Is there a conspiracy among some to discredit the leadership ability of His Excellency Donald Ramotar? Quite possible, for politics is a dirty game. But one thing is certain…the PPP Executive stands firmly behind the President, and so do I.
Former President Bharrat Jagdeo demitted office since August 2011. He has served his country well and should be proud of it. He is committed to serve in an advisory position or as a roving ambassador undertaking special missions if asked to do so by our President. This is not a novel idea. All former Presidents of the United States serve their country in similar capacities if asked to do so by the current President, and Americans are not opposed to that. In fact, they expect former Presidents to do just that. Why then are some so focused on Jagdeo that they fail to see all the development taking place throughout the Regions that are improving the lives of so many Guyanese?
Freddie Kissoon is nothing more than a rabble-rouser. Reading his column as I sometimes do, I often ask myself, “How can anyone hate so much, day after day after day?” Isn’t there anything that this PPP/C Government has done since 1992 that would be appreciated by Freddie Kissoon?
Yet he lives in a very big house in an affluent neighbourhood, has an income, drives a vehicle, and abuses the very freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution and protected by the same people he libels: The President and Ministers of his Government.
Surely Kissoon is much better off today than under the notorious PNC regime that bankrupted the economy, making it impossible for him to achieve the level of success he now enjoys today under the PPP/C.
Harry Gill
Jan 12, 2025
Guyana Harpy Eagles 4-Day practice match… Kaieteur Sports – Captain Kemol Savory and Akshaya Persaud stroked identical half-centuries during the 2nd innings of the Savory XI versus...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- When it comes to political irony, Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo has ascended to a position... more
Sir Ronald Sanders (Antigua and Barbuda’s Ambassador to the US and the OAS) By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News–... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]