Latest update April 12th, 2025 6:32 PM
Feb 10, 2014 Letters
Dear Editor,
Guyana is an evolving democracy. We have managed over the several decades to free ourselves from colonial rule and PNC dictatorial rule. Today we can all take pride in the fact that we live in a full-fledged parliamentary democracy.
The elections of 1953 could be regarded as a watershed in terms of constitutional advancement, even though the first PPP government was short lived thanks to the intrigues of Anglo-American imperialism.
Prior to the elections of 1953, the franchise was limited only to the propertied class and those with money, one consequence of which was the preservation of the then status quo based on naked exploitation of the working class by a dominant expatriate class.
This exploitative situation was facilitated by the Colonial Office, which did very little to protect the interests of the ordinary working people.
The rules of political engagement were to change radically with the advent of the People’s Progressive Party on the political stage. Under the dynamic and charismatic leadership of Dr. Cheddi Jagan, the working people found a true ally and friend who was never afraid to challenge the status quo.
To a very large extent, the introduction of mass-based political parties took shape and form in the outlines of the PPP which was able to connect with the Guyanese people in all parts of the country and right across the ethnic spectrum.
And so it was that in the elections of 1953, the first under Universal Adult Suffrage, the PPP won a resounding victory and set in motion a new political momentum which caught the colonial office off-guard. All manner of machinations and intrigues were used by western vested interests in collaboration with local reactionary groups to remove the PPP from office, including attempts to emasculate the PPP and its leadership.
This found expression in the split of the PPP in 1955 after Forbes Burnham sought unsuccessfully to take over the leadership of the PPP from Dr. Jagan.
The split in the PPP was largely ideological and tactical as Dr. Jagan retained the support of a vast majority of Africans in the Party.
However, the split was exploited by opportunist elements to create ethnic divisions, especially during the early 1960s, which provided the British Government with the excuse it had wanted to impose a new model of government based on proportional representation aimed at removing the PPP from government.
The British Government, under pressure from the United States, deliberately withheld political independence for the colony until the PPP was engineered out of office as in fact happened in the elections of 1964. Two years later, Britain granted independence status to the colony on May 26, 1966 under the PNC-UF coalition Government.
It took well over two decades before constitutional and democratic rule returned to the country in the elections of October 5, 1992.
An entirely new cohort of voters has since emerged who never experienced what life was like during those painful days of authoritarian rule.
Many including some psuedo-intellectuals peddle all manner of misinformation about our past history in their attempt to denigrate the role of the PPP in the struggle for a free and democratic society.
Facts however are stubborn things and no amount of distortion and misinformation can erase from the historical records and our collective institutional memory the role played by the PPP in the advance of the constitutional rights of the Guyanese people.
Hydar Ally
Apr 12, 2025
Kaieteur Sports- In a significant show of support for the next generation of Guyanese cricketers, FL Sport has provided a timely financial contribution to four members of the national Under-15 squad...Peeping Tom Kaieteur News- The People’s Progressive Party Civic has always believed in its own myth. It has fashioned... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- Recent media stories have suggested that King Charles III could “invite” the United... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]