Latest update November 17th, 2024 1:00 AM

Guyana's largest selling daily and New York's most popular weekly

Latest News

Does this ruling bring our debate to an end?

Feb 03, 2014 Letters

Dear Editor,
Guyana never backs down from making contentious decisions that can sometimes have rippling effects around the world. When the Burnham administration welcomed Jim Jones to Guyana, the final act of Jones’ cult put Guyana in the headline news around the world. Now the bombshell of the Chief Justice (CJ) has re-awakened the world to Guyana again.
The decision of the CJ surprised most people. Of course, the Government welcomed the decision which upheld their view that Parliament cannot change the budget as presented by the Minister. What the CJ failed to recognized is that his decision does not only apply to the budget, but every action of all Westminster parliamentary system around the world.
If the CJ is correct in his ruling, then by extension he is telling the parliament that every bill presented by a Minister cannot be amended, but must be voted up or down as presented. Now, now, now, what is the purpose of parliament? It was my belief that politics was “the art of negotiating”, and who else is more qualified to exercise that maxim than a parliament. They are after all the “peoples’ representatives”.
I have heard of the lively debate in our parliament over the years among our illustrious politicians. Does this ruling bring our debate to an end? It seems to me that the CJ is telling the majority that their only role in parliament is to vote for all bills, whether it’s the budget or anything else, on an up or down vote. If this is the case, then there is no more need for debate. A bill will be presented by a Minister; then the Speaker must call for an up or down vote on the bill as presented. What a mockery will this be on any democracy. Even the most hostile dictatorship presents some form of debate in their “sham parliament”.
In the US, the Senate recently amended its own internal procedure “the nuclear option”. Does the CJ finds this rule unconstitutional? What about the rules and procedures of the courts over which he presides? Are these rules and procedures unconstitutional?
I am confident that the appeals court will overturn this ruling by the CJ. If this ruling stands, the opposition of any parliamentary system will be relegated to “insignificance”. Democracy will come to an end as we know it.
Charles Sugrim

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show | November, 15th, 2024

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Hauls from Persaud and Farley highlight MVP Sports Girl’s U11 Football Tourney commencement

Hauls from Persaud and Farley highlight MVP Sports Girl’s U11...

Nov 17, 2024

Kaieteur Sports- The Petra Organisation’s MVP Sports Girl’s Under-11 Football Tournament kicked off in spectacular fashion yesterday at the Ministry of Education ground on Carifesta Avenue,...
Read More
Windies chase 219 for first win of T20 series against England

Windies chase 219 for first win of T20 series...

Nov 17, 2024

Motie joins Amazon Warriors Squad for GSL

Motie joins Amazon Warriors Squad for GSL

Nov 17, 2024

CWI announces West Indies Test Squad for Home Series against Bangladesh

CWI announces West Indies Test Squad for Home...

Nov 17, 2024

𝗗𝗖𝗕 U𝟭𝟱50-overs ‘Next Generation’ Inter-Association Tournament starts today

𝗗𝗖𝗕 U𝟭𝟱50-overs ‘Next...

Nov 17, 2024

Glasgow sets new scoring record as Golden Jaguars settle Barbados 4-1

Glasgow sets new scoring record as Golden Jaguars...

Nov 16, 2024

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.

Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]