Latest update December 24th, 2024 4:10 AM
Aug 31, 2013 Features / Columnists, Peeping Tom
Many years ago when it dawned upon the residents of the new Eccles Housing Scheme that a site for the disposal of refuse would be located behind their posh residential area, a strong protest was launched. The protests did not get far, because an agreement had already been inked between the government and the Inter-American Development Bank for the funding of this dumpsite.
But the protests did show that the newly emerging propertied class in that area was prepared to take action to defend what they saw as something unhealthy and unwanted within their community.
In 2008, some residents of Subryanville, a residential area in the city, filed legal action in order to prevent the authorities from granting permission for the establishment of a business premises within their community. Their main peeve was that the operation of this business would disturb the peace and tranquility of the area.
Not so long ago also, a city club was forced to consult with a resident before it went ahead and granted the final okay for the hosting of a show, which involved loud music. And over the years we have seen a series of actions protesting noise nuisance emanating from shows.
There has been an outcry over the noise problem and congestion of a pub that operates in Kitty.
All of these are growing evidence that citizens are taking steps to ensure that they are not victims of noise nuisances or by the ever-increasing practice of businesses being opened in residential areas.
One of the areas in which residents have, however, been most ineffective, has been in the prevention of squatting. It is not unusual to find in some areas, persons squatting on municipal or government reserves, and despite the fact that this is an illegal act, citizens in some of the poorer parts of the city have been very reluctant to force the authorities to take action against these squatters.
One reason could be that most of these squatters may have originated from within the said area and thus may be known to the residents who might not wish to be seen as going against someone from their own community. Another is that these residents may lack the resources to take legal action.
What these residents do not realise is that the most effective way to reduce property values within an area is to encourage squatting. Squatting breeds a great deal of problems and encourages the stealing of water and electricity, but its most negative consequence is its effects on property values within a community.
Property values in any community should ideally rise with time. As home improvements take place within a community, as infrastructure is put in place, the property values invariably rise, thus increasing the asset value of homeowners.
However, all it takes for those property values to plunge is for squatters to invade that community. Immediately, the property values would fall, in some cases by more than fifty percent.
So you can very well have a situation where someone spends ten million dollars to construct a home, only to find later that instead of that same property fetching fifteen million dollars, it fetches no more than five million dollars.
A few years ago, the Ministry of Housing and Water removed a number of markers placed by squatters on a large piece of state land behind the Caricom Secretariat.
Imagine the embarrassment that would have been caused to the image of Guyana had a squatter settlement developed behind the regional headquarters of the Caribbean Community? Imagine, also, the impact on those luxurious homes in the frontlands of Turkeyen.
Many years ago, two areas suffered because of the uncontrolled squatting that took place in an adjoining area. In the eighties, Prashad Nagar and Lamaha Gardens emerged as two of the more high valued residential areas. However, no sooner were the residents of these two areas basking in their valuable real estate, than an influx of squatters descended on the adjoining state lands in Sophia, creating one of the largest squatting settlements in the country.
Property values in Lamaha Gardens and Prashad Nagar plummeted, to the point where even if homeowners wanted to sell, they would have had to do so at a huge loss.
The government’s regularizing the Sophia settlement has allowed the property values in Prashad Nagar and Lamaha Gardens to be restored, some to an elevated level, but those areas will not likely be considered as having some of the prime real estate in the country. Such honours will go to other areas, including Pradoville.
Ironically, the government has also since 1992 had a massive housing drive, and yet squatting has increased. The reason why this has happened is because those who squat have been allowed to get away with their unlawful actions, actions that have caused legitimate homeowners to suffer.
And yet the government perpetuates this injustice by continuing to promise to regularize emerging squatter settlements.
Dec 24, 2024
Kaieteur Sports – The Maid Marian Wheat Up Women’s Cup 2024 has reached a pivotal stage as four teams have officially advanced to the semi-finals, continuing their quest for championship...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- The City of Georgetown is stink, dirty and disordered. It is littered with garbage, overwhelmed... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The year 2024 has underscored a grim reality: poverty continues to be an unyielding... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]