Hopefully, writers will be guided by facts, and not half-truths on the Amaila project

Aug 28, 2013 Letters

Dear Editor,
I am compelled to respond to a letter appearing in yesterday’s edition of your newspaper (KN 26/08/2013) written by Asquith Rose and Harish S Singh. I believe the following paragraph contained in that letter was carefully constructed and deliberately intended to mislead your readers:
“What we do know is that David Granger and APNU did the right thing by not voting for the Amaila Bill in parliament, and the people are clearly on their side. In joining with the PPP/C to vote for the bill, the AFC not only did the wrong thing but it appears as though they did not have the people’s interest at heart. If the AFC did have their interest at heart, then why would its leaders allow Sithe Global Inc to charge Guyanese a 19% interest rate when commercial lending interest rates in Europe and North America are less than half that amount?”
The first sentence contains the first lie. There was never an Amaila Bill before the parliament and the authors of the letter are aware of this. The second sentence uses this lie in order to imply that the Alliance For Change’s (AFC’s) parliamentary vote for two supporting measures for the project was a vote for the project in its entirety. This lets them conclude in the next sentence that the AFC has allowed Sithe to charge an exorbitant interest rate.
Also in that sentence, the gentlemen deliberately misuse the term interest rate to refer to what is actually a rate of return on investment or equity. They then repeat a similar line later down in the letter as follows:
Further, if they had the people’s interest at heart, they would not have allowed Sithe Global to charge 19 percent interest rate on its loan of US$157 million to the Amaila project when the average commercial lending rate in North America and Europe is between 6 percent and 8 percent.
In this instance they’ve added the word loan to strengthen their case. I believe they both know that the US$157 million was an investment and not a loan, and therefore their comparisons to average commercial lending rates is misleading. Why not make the right comparisons so we can all be better informed?
Ultimately your readers will have to form their own conclusions, and in doing so it is hoped they will be guided by the facts and not influenced by such cleverly assembled half truths as contained in the above mentioned letter by Rose and Singh.
Dominic Gaskin

Latest News

Hopefully, writers will be guided by facts, and not half-truths on the Amaila project

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| February, 7th, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

SBM Offshore Guyana & VFMA launch Girls in Football Development...

Imlach and Nandu fifties pilot Harpy Eagles to...

A look at Government’s boldest investment in...

Barker wins big, Khalil and Simpson inch closer...

Trophy Stall on board Republic Cup three-day...

13-year old benefits from Project “Cricket Gear...

Features/Columnists

You cannot borrow your way to prosperity

OAS Secretary General Election and renewed OAS Consensus

Jagdeo on land, Hughes

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]

Hopefully, writers will be guided by facts, and not half-truths on the Amaila project

Share this:

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| February, 7th, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]