Now we’ll learn how serious we are about good governance

May 23, 2013 Letters

Dear Editor,
The demands made by the political opposition as pre-conditions to giving support to the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Act are just. For while this bill seeks to hold Guyana accountable as a regional/international business partner among fellow nation states, the country will again be done a grave disservice if, like so many other instances, laws are made but the political will and maturity are lacking to activate them.
Germane to this bill is the issue of accountability by government, organisation and individual, under a universal law to ensure business transactions not only conform to financial probity, but also ensures the security/safety of self and the nation.
Given this country’s international notoriety and the overwhelming presence of an illegal economy, it is in the interest of all who wish to live in a society where laws are paramount, safety is guaranteed and violators held accountable, to call on the government to listen, equally as we call on the opposition to ensure that frameworks are put in place, not only for this bill but for every law and institution that seek to safeguard our rights.
A country is not held to ransom when its citizens/elected representatives demand government – whose primary function is to serve and protect them – acts in a manner that will respect and safeguard their wellbeing. A country is held to ransom when any government or individual thinks it/he/she can disregard the will of the people and be selective in honouring laws. Government is usually expected to lead by example and the calls made by the opposition to the executive presents the opportunity for President Ramotar to demonstrate to this nation he understands modern governance and how it ought to work. It offers him an opportunity, once again, to prove his mettle. And if the administration fails to so heed or thinks that it can so fail to heed by engaging in attacks and misinformation, then the workers/citizens are duty bound to make known that their resources and wellbeing will no longer be held hostage to a primitive political culture.
The fact that the executive has chosen to use the power vested in it by the people, not in the interest of the people, and being emboldened by others to continue along this path because of the personal benefit they derive from such action/association, ought not to be countenanced by those who know better.
To call on the opposition to work with the government to pass the bill to avoid reported sanctions, without calling upon and seeing to, that the government works with the opposition in restoring good governance, is an abrogation of civic duty. The threat of sanctions ought not to be used as an excuse to subvert or deny the opposition its responsibility to hold the executive accountable. Rather, those who recognise or fear such sanctions should be calling on the government to use the threat of same to honour its responsibility under the constitution and so hold themselves accountable.
Further, the failure to provide needed information, or produce a bill close to deadline in the hope that such will escape accountability, or ignore day-to-day good governance, which the Public Procurement Commission and the Fiscal Management Accountability Act, among others seek to secure, are demonstrations of contempt for the people.
Given the administration’s reputation in disregarding current laws and avoidance to establish laws to ensure internal sanctions for selected public office holders should be of concern to all. Thus, those using a timeline and what they construe as negative impact on business, Guyana’s so-called creditworthiness, money transfer, etc., absent of calling for the implementation of the foregoing, are enabling the use of public offices for wrongdoing. And by extension their pronouncement gives credence to the international community calls, via this bill, in demanding the society halts such practices and sanctions those who engage in same.
For one cannot demand the passing of a bill because it allows your business to function or money to flow to the State, when money if not properly managed at the State level opens another avenue for laundering and protection, by virtue of the State’s refusal to put laws in place to sanction those who violate the public trust. If the Ramotar administration, civil society and individuals are serious about good governance, honouring laws and respecting/protecting the people, the opposition’s positions present the opportunity to demonstrate this.
Lincoln Lewis

Latest News

Now we’ll learn how serious we are about good governance

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| March, 17th, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

NSC, Office of the DPP to host Criminal Law and Sexual Offences Act...

Lucas Chung maintains strong standing at 2nd...

Farm Supplies Ltd. supports Bartica Regatta 2025

Legislation and Investment: Trinidad to Brazil,...

Three more matches billed for this weekend

CM Khan rules at 2025 National Blitz Chess...

Features/Columnists

“One Guyana” is no less a national slogan than “Green Guyana”

If Guyana’s President Ali is the “Zelensky of the Caribbean”, who is the Putin?

Partner v. investor

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]

Now we’ll learn how serious we are about good governance

Share this:

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| March, 17th, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]