Latest update December 19th, 2024 3:22 AM
May 01, 2013 Letters
Dear Editor,
In 1975 during the visit of the Council of Namibia to Guyana, the Burnham-led People’s National Congress government unveiled a monument to the African Liberation Fighters. The Monument’s inscription is instructive thirty-eight years later, as some with an axe to grind attempt to besmirch Burnham record on South Africa.
“Mourn not for us who died; But for our brothers everywhere who live in bondage; And in mourning turn away to act!”
This is significant because on the issue of the liberation of Southern Africa, Burnham was not just an actor but a principal leader. In the face of criticism by the likes of Horace Campbell, there is no need to defend Burnham’s record on the liberation of Africa and more specifically Southern Africa. The facts are in the public domain for all to see.
Forbes Burnham, his party the PNC, and the people of Guyana showed visionary leadership in the liberation movement. The people of Guyana gave their blood and their treasure for the liberation of Southern Africa. At a time when others felt that our pledge of monetary support for the struggle was too “grandiose” and a waste of money, Burnham showed leadership and said that we were giving because it was our duty to give.
In an ironic twist of history those who were in opposition to what we were doing have been the recipient of the Tambo award.
The red herrings that are being thrown into the debate, seeking to influence the South African Government to reverse its decision to give the OR Tambo Award to Forbes Burnham is in my opinion malicious and political grandstanding. When Forbes Burnham made the decision to allow Cuban planes with military personnel and equipment, en-route to Africa to refuel at Timehri, he knew the political and economic risk, but he did it because it was the right thing to do.
When Burnham pledged an annual donation of US$50,000 to the Freedom Fighters, he knew it was a financial sacrifice, but we did it because it was the right thing to do. When the Burnham government joined the Olympic boycott in 1972 he knew that Guyana’s opportunity to gain a Gold Medal in the 200 meters would be forfeited, but we did not attend, and James Wren-Gilkes never got his Gold medal; but it was a sacrifice we took for our brothers to be free.
When Burnham gave scholarship to African students to study in Guyana (free of charge), he did it because he knew that there was a need for leaders in the movement and leaders had to be educated. Burnham was never silent on the question of the rights of the African states to be free and he not only talked the talk, but he backed it up with action.
The Burnham record on Southern Africa in clear and unambiguous, for as early as the 1950’s Burnham was condemning the killings in Nyasaland and calling for an end to the brutal regimes in Southern Africa.
Though out of government, he called for a boycott of goods to the Pretoria regime and for a fund to assist the relatives of those who had fallen at Sharpsville and Pondoland.
I urge our young people who did not live through this period to do their research and review the Burnham record on the Liberation Movement. I close like I opened in saying that there is no need for anyone to defend Forbes Burnham’s record on Southern Africa. It is a stellar record and will stand the test of time, for what he did and what he did in our name (Guyana) in no small way was directly responsible for the Liberation of Southern Africa.
Mark Archer
Dec 19, 2024
Fifth Annual KFC Goodwill Int’l Football Series Kaieteur Sports-The 2024 KFC Under-18 International Goodwill Football Series, which is coordinated by the Petra Organisation, continued yesterday at...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- In any vibrant democracy, the mechanisms that bind it together are those that mediate differences,... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – The government of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela has steadfast support from many... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]