Latest update December 18th, 2024 5:45 AM
Mar 18, 2013 Letters
Dear Editor,
Last week Thursday, I was at the Critchlow Labour College. While there I observed
Prime Minister, Samuel Hinds, Mr. Michael Brassington Head of NICIL, Mr. Christopher Ram and a few other well known male Guyanese including the leader of the Guyana Trade Union Congress.
In fact, I wanted to see Mr Witter but was informed that he would be in at a meeting with stakeholders on the Labour issues which have developed as a result of over 200 Chinese nationals being employed on the Marriott project bypassing jobless Guyanese.
I felt good, for in my mind I could only visualise one possible result from that meeting. A further erosion of the Government posture that Guyanese are not qualified to work on this project, as the representative of Guyanese Labour demonstrated to the National Administrators, the weakness of their line of reasoning, especially in an environment of 30 plus percent unemployment and underemployment.
This was not to be and it is only today, one week after that meeting, that I have summoned the courage to deal with what can be described as nothing short of non leadership displayed by the representatives of Guyanese Labour.
Kaieteur News headline the next day indicated that our Labour leaders hailed the fact that they have been able to get the Government leaders to concede, that in future projects Guyanese workers would be given priority. This is in fact a Coup de Grace of Guyanese Labour.
How mature Labour Leaders could not see it, has been the question I have been asking myself over the past week. It is public knowledge that this uncaring
Government will do anything to further impoverish the Guyanese working class.
What is bothersome is that those people who sat in that room and allowed Sam Hinds and company to convince them that the Marriott project is too important to be delayed, did not take into account the PPP/C’s track record on agreements made in times of crisis.
Former President Desmond Hoyte expressed disgust at their behaviour after two such agreements, in which his language clearly said that he felt duped. The people of Linden are trying to find out where they blundered in the latest of such agreements, and the list can go on.
In other words I am saying that they failed the Guyanese working class, who are of the opinion that the Marriot, in the first place. is not a priority. The kokers in Georgetown are among the priorities which the PPP/C have no consideration for. The position adopted by our Labour Leaders as a result of that meeting is one which I could not have envisaged, especially since the Marriott project did not get Parliamentary approval to spend resources owned by the Guyanese working class. The fact that this project is simply there as a facility to provide work for non-Guyanese and is based on an illegal investment of our funds is enough reason to delay if not stop it, so I am yet to understand the logic of the representatives of Labour.
However let us fat forward to two of the major project in the future, in which the Chinese would be involved.
• Amaila’s Fall Hydroelectric facility, the road to it and the power transmission line
• The Upgrading of the Cheddi Jagan Aeroport
Both of these projects are being financed in a large way by the Chinese, as was the Guysuco’s Skeldon project, a project on which Chinese Technology and Labour performed poorly.
Hence my question is, what would the Government of Guyana say to the Chinese Government, the Chinese Banks and the Chinese contracting firms that they could not have said to the present contractor who is building the Marriott, using finances owned in large part by the Guyanese workers?
We should note at the said meeting that the Government side dropped the argument of lack of skill Guyanese and for the first time revealed that they simply gave the contractor the right to source workers, from any which way. On this another source has informed that many of the Chinese here are prisoners, hence cheap labour, akin to indentureship. An issue again for the Labour leaders of this country, and Human Rights groups, I hope they can investigate this to our satisfaction.
Earlier press reports indicated that there was a secret deal with respect to the Aeroport project, when things are done in secret there is no telling what would result.
The Marriott was also done in secret. Hence on this I would ask the representatives of Labour and the Government of Guyana what is an acceptable minimum benchmark percentage of the labour force on these future projects that must be Guyanese born?
On the other hand what levels should be exclusively Chinese?
With regards the projects associated with Amaila Falls, it is known that IDB has given approval for Chinese Labour to be engaged so how come PM Hinds and Mr Brassington can pull this barefaced con scheme on Guyanese.
Is it just another manifestation of their uncaring nature towards the Guyanese workforce?
Before President Jagdeo left office he virtually promised any Chinese on landing in
Guyana a three-year work permit, and the automatic right to Guyanese Citizenship.
To enforce the con scheme I can see many of the Chinese labourers now employed in Guyana including those on the Marriott and GPL projects being fast tracked to becoming Guyanese citizens, hence making a mockery of the criterion that Guyanese Labour would be given first preference on future contracts.
Elton McRae
Dec 18, 2024
-KFC Goodwill Int’l Football Series heats up today Kaieteur News- The Petra Organisation’s fifth Annual KFC International Secondary Schools Goodwill Football Series intensified yesterday with two...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- In any vibrant democracy, the mechanisms that bind it together are those that mediate differences,... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – The government of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela has steadfast support from many... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]