Latest update March 21st, 2025 7:03 AM
Jan 08, 2013 News
…Opposition questions authority
The government is spending money that the National Assembly did not approve and the opposition is not about to let the matter go easily. The opposition wants to know exactly how much money the House did not approve that has been spent, and it also wants to know to which agencies monies were “illegally” paid over.
Those answers are expected to come this Thursday when the National Assembly meets.
Once the answers come in, the Opposition will make its next move, with Carl Greenidge of opposition coalition APNU citing a resort to disciplinary provisions of Parliament and even to the courts for a breach of the constitution.
Finance Minister, Dr. Ashni Singh, is reported to have said, in delivering his 2012 Mid-Year Report, that he had restored the sums the House deleted from the 2012 Budget. Singh said that he was able to do so based on the fact that “the National Assembly was later deemed by the Courts of Guyana to have acted outside its constitutional remit in inflicting those cuts to the budget.”
The Opposition has argued that the government has been misinterpreting the decision of the Chief Justice, a decision which is in itself a preliminary one.
Khemraj Ramjattan, leader of the seven-seat Alliance for Change (AFC), said that the use of the Funds is “criminal.”
The Chief Justice had ruled that the National Assembly can approve and disapprove of the budget, but not cut it. It is on that basis that the government said it had restored the $21 billion that was cut from the budget.
However, the opposition insists that the Minister is misreading the ruling of the Chief Justice.
The Chief Justice had denied the request of the Attorney General and denied the Minister of Finance the “liberty” to make advances/ withdrawals from the Consolidated Fund to restore the $21 billion 2012 budget cuts, except for the sum of $99M for the Ethnic Relations Commission (ERC).
The Chief Justice said the reason for the funds going to the ERC is because it is a constitutional body and its funding is not subject to a vote of the National Assembly.
Accordingly, Ramjattan argues that except for the monies denied for the ERC, there are no funds cut from the budget that can be restored. He said that the only way that the money not budgeted for can be spent is if the need for it is “urgent and unforeseen.”
“They want to draw down the money and then come to us to approve it. That is criminal,” Ramjattan declared.
Dr. Roger Luncheon, the Head of the Presidential Secretariat, stated that “the $1 that was approved by the Opposition for the various Agencies was totally inconsistent with the constitutional provision as ruled by the Chief Justice;” and that, “no one lost their jobs.”
The National Assembly did not approve of finances for the Government Information Agency (GINA) and contract workers at the Office of the President, among others. But Dr Luncheon had stated that “Contingency Funds were approved and funds made available belatedly, but still available to meet the wages and salaries of the contract workers at Office of the President.”
To get the matter cleared up, Greenidge has a string of questions for the Finance Minister.
He wants the Minister to say whether monies cut from the Budget and not approved by the House have been restored to the Ministries. He has asked the Minister to answer what categories and sums have been involved, the legal basis for such payments, and what advice was provided on this matter by the Attorney General.
Greenidge has also asked the Minister what section of the Chief Justice’s report/decision suggests that either the Chief Justice or the Ministry of Finance can restore cuts to the budget or that the Chief Justice can authorise the Ministry of Finance to make advances from the Consolidated Fund.
Greenidge argued that if indeed the minister has spent monies not approved of in the budget, he would be guilty of breaching the Fiscal Management and Accountability Act.
Mar 21, 2025
Kaieteur Sports– In a proactive move to foster a safer and more responsible sporting environment, the National Sports Commission (NSC), in collaboration with the Office of the Director of...Kaieteur News- The notion that “One Guyana” is a partisan slogan is pure poppycock. It is a desperate fiction... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: glennlall2000@gmail.com / kaieteurnews@yahoo.com