Latest update December 31st, 2024 3:30 AM
Jul 05, 2012 Letters
DEAR EDITOR,
As a teacher in the public school system in New York City, I have followed with great interest the ongoing debate on Corporal Punishment in Guyana’s Independent press, SN and KN.
Mahendra Doraisam’s letter in KN (July 4th) titled, “CP is from a fossilized system” makes nice, neat, political and cultural arguments for Guyana to join the other states that have outlawed CP, but falls short of one important aspect: What do we put in its place? Should we just follow other nations because it sounds culturally progressive?
Simply put, corporal punishment is a disciplinary tool that, if used wisely, sparingly – not abusively – and follows the Education Ministry’s guidelines, will ensure a classroom environment where teaching and learning can take place.
Outlawing CP, I fear, will create an environment where all teaching and learning will grind to a halt. Rowdy classrooms and disruptive students will create a situation where all will be deprived of a healthy learning environment. (Ask me. I work in a NYC classroom. Both Richmond HS and John Adams HS located in this Guyanese village in Queens, New York have closed down because of low student achievements. Go figure).
Am I arguing for the liberal and ready use of the cane whip? Flogging if the student gets 1 out 5 Math problems right? Of course not!
Retaining CP on the books, using it only in rare cases, namely for a category of well-defined disruptive behaviors will inculcate a (positive) fear in the minds of students – and cause them to behave appropriately and respect the rights of other students. In other words, the mere existence of this disciplinary tool – rather than the quick and abundant use of it – will elicit positive conduct and behaviors from students.
It is often said that CP is a poor man’s (read poor countries’) disciplinary tool. So let us look at New York City. CP has been outlawed; replaced with a system of referrals and hearings etc. One writer in the New York Times, in a well researched article full of facts and statistics, said this system is costing the taxpayers millions of dollars each year (many teaching days lost by teachers going to hearings) – and it doesn’t work. Each year, the classroom environment gets worse than the previous year. Can Guyana (per capita income USD 3,000 a year) afford a system like this that will put a burden on the taxpayers, and for an alternative disciplinary system that has proven not to work?
At the end of the day, what we need is a reasonably disciplined student body and a classroom that is conducive to learning and teaching. And, if an enlightened corporal punishment system – whose essence lies in its existence on the books rather than flogging at the drop of a hat – will produce the desirable classroom environment, let it be.
Finally let us avoid these loaded phrases: “CP is from a fossilized system”; “Govt. is advocating beating the kids”.
They emotionalize and do not contribute to a meaningful debate. We need facts, higher order reasoning and a disciplinary system that works.
Mike Persaud
Dec 31, 2024
By Rawle Toney Kaieteur Sports- In the rich tapestry of Guyanese sports, few names shine as brightly as Keevin Allicock. A prodigious talent with the rare blend of skill, charisma, and grit, Allicock...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- Jimmy Carter’s presidency fell victim to global and domestic upheavals. His single term... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The year 2024 has underscored a grim reality: poverty continues to be an unyielding... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]