Latest update March 20th, 2025 5:10 AM
Dec 25, 2011 Letters
Dear Editor,
With reference to a letter by GECOM’s press officer seeking to “educate” Mr. Freddie Kissoon (KN 23.12.2011 & SN 24.12.2011) on matters pertaining to GECOM’s management of the registration and electoral process, while I am sure that Mr. Kissoon will respond shortly in his own uniquely elegant manner, permit me to offer some comments on two sections of the letter.
Firstly, Mr. Persaud is correct in claiming that the Commission never (publicly) acknowledged any seat mistake whatsoever. What he fails to disclose is that none other than the Chairman of GECOM, in the presence of myself, two AFC colleagues and a GECOM employee, in the offices of GECOM, produced and displayed the original Region 10 statement of polls which clearly highlighted the origins of some of the errors in the computation of the votes used to declare the results.
It was further explained that GECOM staff were working under tremendous pressure and as such human errors can occur. Admittedly, the Chairman also informed us that based on legal advice, GECOM was powerless to change the results and this was now a matter for the Courts.
The AFC subsequently filed an election petition to have these errors corrected; our case was dismissed on the technicality that all relevant parties were not served notice on time, service of the notice, as I was informed by my legal colleagues, was the responsibly of the Registry and not the AFC.
It was interesting to read a recently released wikileaks cable (Identifier: 06GEORGETOWN1162) which purportedly claims to be quoting the GECOM Chairman as stating “he considered the AFC’s claims to be baseless.”
The same cable also states that former PNC GECOM commissioner Haslyn Parris privately scrutinized the AFC data and concurred with our findings. Since the previously mentioned meeting was held after the date of this cable, I can only assume that further research was conducted which established firm basis for our claims.
Mr. Editor, now that Mr. Persaud has confirmed that GECOM had conducted an internal investigation on our 2006 Region 10 claim, then is it not time that GECOM states the results of their investigations – who were the rightful winners of the second geographical seat in Region 10 in the 2006 elections?
Secondly, with regards to the distribution of scrutineer’s funds, Mr. Persaud is being disingenuous. He correctly stated that GECOM was never in possession of any monies to pay parties.
However, he omits to “educate” Mr. Kissoon on the fact that payment to parties and individuals were made on the advice of GECOM.
In other words, GECOM prepared the payment vouchers which were sent to the Ministry of Finance to effect payment. GECOM still had a responsibility to obey the Court ruling which stated that payments to scrutineers were to be made on a proportional basis – this duly could not be absolved by the simple reason that GECOM did not sign the cheques – it was their duty to uphold the ruling of the highest court in the land and prepare payment vouchers reflecting AFC’s rightful proportional share.
On the same note, Mr. Persaud may want to inform us as to who make payments to the PPP/C and PNC for their 2006 polling day staff? Additionally, he may also want to inform the public if any payments were made to political parties to offset polling day activities for the 2011 elections.
I am eagerly awaiting a response from GECOM in regards to the above, in particular the results of the 2006 geographic seat claim.
David Patterson
Mar 20, 2025
2025 Commissioner of Police T20 Cup… Kaieteur Sports- Guyana Police Force team arrested the Presidential Guards as they handed them a 48-run defeat when action in the 2025 Commissioner of Police...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- There was a time when an illegal immigrant in America could live in the shadows with some... more
Antigua and Barbuda’s Ambassador to the US and the OAS, Ronald Sanders By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- In the latest... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]