Latest update April 6th, 2025 11:06 AM
Sep 21, 2011 News
The former president of a luxury charter company whose jet barreled off New Jersey’s Teterboro Airport runway in 2005 was sentenced yesterday to 2½ years in prison by a judge who said he did not believe the crash was a result of regulatory violations, according to a story by the online news, northjersey.com.
The jet ploughed through a steel perimeter fence and struck two cars as it crossed six lanes of a highway before crashing into this clothing warehouse and bursting into flames.
“I’m just not satisfied from the evidence I heard that the conduct alleged caused the plane to crash,” U.S. District Judge Dennis M Cavanaugh told a packed courtroom in Newark at the sentencing of Guyana-born brothers Michael and Paul Brassington, executives and co-founders of the now-defunct Platinum Jet Management LLC of Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Ruling that the applicable sentencing guidelines overstated the seriousness of the offence, the judge rejected a range of 97 to 121 months for Michael Brassington and instead gave him 30 months in prison.
Similarly, Cavanaugh ruled the 97- to 121-month range for Paul Brassington was inappropriate and sentenced him to 18 months.
Both men apologized to the judge and the victims of the crash, which injured 14, and maintained they never intended to hurt anyone.
The two brothers were convicted last November by a jury that found they put profits ahead of safety in a scheme to overload jets with cheap fuel.
Michael Brassington, the President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Pilot, was portrayed by prosecutors as the architect of a scheme to defraud passengers, charter brokers, the Federal Aviation Administration and others by misrepresenting his company’s compliance with safety regulations.
He was found guilty on the most serious charge of endangering the safety of an aircraft in flight. The jury found him guilty on eight additional charges and cleared him on 12 counts of making false statements.
His younger brother, a former Vice President largely responsible for sales and marketing, was found guilty only of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and was acquitted on four other counts.
The charge of endangering the safety of an aircraft in flight related to Michael Brassington’s concealment of dangerous over-fueling and weight distribution practices that caused the jet’s centre of gravity to exceed its forward weight limit for takeoff, contributing to the Feb. 2, 2005, Teterboro crash, according to National Transportation Safety Board investigators.
But Cavanaugh rejected that explanation, saying he agreed with the conclusion of a defence expert who testified that the crash was more likely caused by a mechanical failure.
“I recognize the issue was serious but I don’t find evidence that what they did caused this tragic crash,” the judge said.
The Bombardier Challenger 600 jet ploughed through a steel perimeter fence and struck two cars as it crossed six lanes of Route 46 before crashing into a clothing warehouse and bursting into flames. Both pilots and two car passengers were seriously injured.
Comments are closed.
Apr 06, 2025
-Action concludes today Kaieteur Sports- In a historic occurrence for Guyana’s Basketball fraternity the ‘One Guyana’ 3×3 Quest opened yesterday, Saturday, morning at the Cliff...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- There are moments in the history of nations when fate lays before them a choice not of... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- Recent media stories have suggested that King Charles III could “invite” the United... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]
Michael Brassington, i have known since Primary School we were not in touch after high school as such, we once attended the National Service Camp with other students along with his sister. I knew he eventually became a pilot. He is lucky to have received the sentence he did and the waving of fees for such a horrific accident where there was no loss of life. He and others involved have a lot to be thankful for. Remember, “By his deeds shall a man be know…”
So if you (the judge) does not believe the prosecutor and think the crash was caused by mechanical failure then why not vacate the conviction?
Yet another overzealous prosecutor….
I am asking myself the same question – Seems ODD