Latest update December 25th, 2024 1:10 AM
Dec 31, 2009 Letters
Dear Editor,
The Guyana Bauxite & General Workers Union (GB&GWU) has nothing to hide.
In the letter dated November 13, 2009, signed by me that the Bauxite Company Guyana Inc (BCGI) referred to in its “Information Memorandum to the Public” and threatened to “publish at an appropriate
time,” the Union wrote the General Manager, Mr. Sergey Kostyuk, accepting the Company’s No. 1 Option which read as follows:
“The Company will increase wages up to 10% and make retroactive payments. In order to perform this action, it is necessary to carry out retrenchment of workers in proportion, according to the production
volume decrease in 2009. Please be reminded that BCGI produced 1890 thousand ton of bauxite with 496 employees within 2007 and 1634 thousand ton of bauxite within 2008. In 2008, retrenchments amounted to as low as practicable 12%. Production target for 2009 is 1293 thousand ton. Thus expected retrenchment may affect another 14 % of the current staff or 75 employees.”
The trade union adheres to a principle which says “nothing is agreed, until all is agreed upon,” which means that there can be no payment or retrenchment until everything enshrined in this proposal or any other, modified or in its entirety, is agreed upon.
For the Union, increased wages is one issue and retrenchment is another and has to be dealt with separately, consistent with the Collective Labour Agreement (CLA). GB&GWU’s understanding of the “increased wages up to 10 %” is that the increase can fall anywhere within the continuum from 1-10%. This for the Union would have been contingent on the company: 1) providing us with its Work Plan consistent with the Agreement between the Government of Guyana and RUSAL which would have
given insight into the performance level of the company and what needs to done by the workers to help the company fulfill its obligation. And 2) the Operation Plan for 2010 in light of the company projecting a production level that “may affect” retrenchment for 75 employees. For the union, the operative words were “may affect” and the company would have had to produce justifiable evidence before there was an agreement for retrenchment. Both the Termination of Employment and Severance Pay Act and the Collective Labour Agreement prescribe how retrenchment will be conducted. In the case where a trade union exists, the company is legally committed to write the union, giving notice of retrenchment, honouring the stipulated period, engagement and agreement between the two parties. While the Union advised the company that the retrenchment issue is separate and distinct from the wage increase and has to be
dealt with independently consistent with the CLA and the laws, the company was not prepared to conform.
It should be remembered the Option stated above was the company’s that it has since run away from and threatened the workers not to accept.
The Union is of the opinion that BCGI’s refusal to enter negotiation on its own proposal has to do with it not wanting the Union to see its Operation Plan consistent with the Agreement between RUSAL and the
Guyana Government. Also, its wanting the Union to accept retrenchment without providing justification and respecting due process. This is negotiating in bad faith and is the background to the company’s continued violations of the laws, CLA and workers’ rights we are witnessing today.
The GB&GWU calls on the Ministry of Labour to intervene now to stop the transgressions of workers’ rights and the violations of the rule of law.
Leslie Gonsalves
General Secretary (ag.)
GB&GWU.
Dec 25, 2024
Over 70 entries in as $7M in prizes at stake By Samuel Whyte Kaieteur Sports- The time has come and the wait is over and its gallop time as the biggest event for the year-end season is set for the...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- Ah, Christmas—the season of goodwill, good cheer, and, let’s not forget, good riddance!... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The year 2024 has underscored a grim reality: poverty continues to be an unyielding... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]