Nothing new in Ms. McDougall’s report that has not been stated before

Mar 31, 2009 Letters

---

Dear Editor,
As was expected, after internal strategizing, the government’s ghost writers, the Chronicle, NCN, several racial and criminally commercial entrepreneurs launched their attack on Ms. Gay McDougall in an attempt to discredit her and hence her report.
These merry men of our racial circus have failed and moreso, by their personal attacks, deliberate untruths and rabid intellectual racism, these “gong show” disciples have proved everything her report stated.
These individuals are very upset because the Heads of Government of the 192 Member States of the United Nations are now fully aware of the racial and criminal tragedy Guyana has become.
Truth is, there is nothing new in Ms. McDougall’s report that has not been stated before. Only the degree to which Guyana as a Nation has regressed socially, politically, morally, economically and racially has changed.
Former President Carter said the same about Guyana and he was here for weeks and his Carter Centre here for years. The World Bank has said it. Former Ambassadors and High Commissioners have said it, privately and in official internal reports.
Prime Ministers and Heads of States in the Caribbean and Latin America have said it. Local editors have proclaimed the same messages: We are a divided Nation”. “We have corrosive racial politics”. “We need to change our political system”.
Now that Gay McDougall has said it, this extremely credible United Nations expert is telling untruths and has been influenced by extremists.
Former President Jimmy Carter is an extremism according to the miscreants complaining about Ms. Mc Dougall. Is this racism? Jimmy Carter is White. Gay McDougall is Black. In attacking her report, the ghost writers who live in a “fantasy of denial” show their rabid racism. The stench of their racism is being smelled across the globe.
For the uneducated and functionally illiterate whom the Government are trying to influence and for the uninformed, the government’s propaganda machine correctly called ghost writers, had three strategies. The first was to state Gay McDougall was only in Guyana for four days and did not meet Amerindians, the real minority group in Guyana, hence her report is null and void. Second, she was influenced by extremists like the Guyana Human Rights Association and ACDA and therefore she doesn’t have a clue about Guyana.
Third, she is promoting “shared governance” because she wants Africans to get power through the back door.
What are the realities of these claims of denial?
Before coming to Guyana and before writing her UN Report, Ms. McDougall would have read many UN Reports about Guyana (there are more than 10 UN agencies including UNDP).
She would have read in particular, the report by the Special Rapporteur on Contemporary forms of Racism in 2003 which said “the harsh reality is one of ethnic polarization among Guyanese of African, Indian and Indigenous descent”.. She would have read President Carter and the Carter Centre’s report. She would have read about Roger Khan and have access to other documents about him.
She would have read his public advertisement and read that the US Government claims he was involved in the racial murders of over 200 African Guyanese. She would have read and seen vivid newspaper pictures of torture or “ruffing up”.
She would have read about Lusignan, Bartica and Lindo Creek. She would have read US Drug Country Reports. She would have read President Jagdeo’s unapologetic and racist comments at Babu John, messages and especially the one in which he stated that a PNC win would result in African criminals being given guns to murder Indians. She would have read about the government’s denial of radio to Linden residents.
Now, is Ms. McDougall more domestically and internationally more credible than President Jagdeo, Prem Misir, Gail Teixeira or the  PPP’s ghost writers and racial extremists? Who is more credible, President Jagdeo or the evidence in Roger Khan case compiled by the US. Case closed.
The PPP propaganda machine jumped up and down and called Ms. McDougall’s report “grossly inaccurate and extremely offensive”. They argued she did not address Amerindian issues. This argument shows how intellectually barren the government has become. Why?
Guyana is a country of “minorities”. Indians are 43.5%, Africans are 30 %, Amerindians are 9.2% and some new breed concocted to hide Guyana’s racial problems and divisiveness called “mixed” are 16.7%. Ms. McDougall’s mission and report dealt with racial minorities.
The two largest racial minorities in Guyana are Indians and Africans. This was the centre of her report. It is only our pernicious Westminster model of governance than makes the PPP an electoral majority with only 180,000 votes or 36% of the voter base of 492,000 eligible voters. Remember, the Indian population should have 43.5 % of eligible voters or 204,000 voters. So much for the ambient myth that a large number of Africans voted for the PPP at the last elections. They just didn’t vote.
The other key point centered around shared governance. Here again the PPP apologists attack her recommendations. But what is the reality?
Guyana is a constitutional monarchy masquerading as a Democracy. President Jagdeo does not share power with his own Party, the Cabinet, Parliament or Judiciary. He is constitutionally above the Law. He can commit murder and the Police, Army or Judiciary can do nothing while he is President or after he is President. The call for shared governance as a solution for Guyana is not new. The Ethnic Relations Commission at their last Stakeholder conference at Ocean View was unanimously told that shared governance is what the people of Guyana needed.
The ERC never took this to Parliament where it has the constitutional mandate to do. Former President Jimmy Carter said this but stated President Jagdeo “is an intelligent and capable leader, but he takes full advantage of the ancient “winner take all” system in Guyana”. Jimmy Carter also stated  “Instead of achieving this crucial goal of inclusive and shared governance, the Guyanese government remains divided with a winner-take-all concept that continues to polarize many aspects of the nation’s life
One editorial stated “In view of our stated national goal, as summarized in our national motto – “One People, One Nation, One Destiny”, there is an inherent tension in the notion that an external agency should be promoting the entrenchment of separate group identities in our country”.
I find this statement perplexing and fit it in the context of “plausible deniability”.
It is the PPP and especially the President through speeches such as Babu John that has polarized this country. Through discrimination, racism, insatiable corruption, marginalisation and political indifference that have promoted the entrenchment of separate group identities in our country.
We need to take heed of Ms. McDougall’s report and find peaceful solutions for our nation. Our motto of “One People, One Nation, One Destiny” cannot be achieved by a Westminster Executive Presidency model of governance. Westminster means winner-take-all. There are winners and losers and in Guyana’s case given the ethnic composition of political parties…ethnic winners and ethnic losers. Our motto means Unity…One People, One Nation, One Destiny. You cannot achieve unity through winners and losers and in a process where elections become a life and death struggle. If we continue along this path of racial and moral insanity, Jimmy Carter’s statement will continue to haunt us all
“Of all the countries I have visited in the world, Guyana has the most unrealised potential. It is my hope and prayer that the future will be filled with peace, harmony, mutual respect, and economic and social progress”.
Eric Phillips

---

---