Latest update April 4th, 2025 6:13 AM
Jan 15, 2009 Letters
Dear Editor,
Those who continue to advocate the need for shared-governance, the PNCR and its associates, as a panacea to the problems in Guyana are by far dishonest.
Guyana’s current governance practices remain one of the most progressive in the Caribbean and the world. The PPP/C Administration pursued constitutional changes since 1997 to advance the process of inclusiveness in Guyana.
The climate of shared governance relies heavily on consistent, trustworthy practicalities that underpin level-headed, efficient and un-speculative dispositions. Trust is defined as “a firm reliance on the integrity, ability or character of a person or thing”, in this case the principals and their political parties.
It is unfortunate but not unusual for Ms. Lurlene Nestor whose letter in the SN criticised President Jagdeo’s comment on the need for trust to pursue political cooperation missed the salient points on this issue. However, while I expect Nestor to take a slanted position in support of her party, SNs’ ‘coincidental’ support for every opposition stance is too glaring (see last Sunday’s editorial). I will on another occasion deal with this matter separately.
That apart, President Jagdeo was on the ball when he said that we were beginning to see the blossoming of political cooperation when factions within the PNCR began to vehemently criticise Robert Corbin and the eventual threat to is leadership surfaced. There is a strong suspicion that those factions within the PNCR which pressured Corbin away from attempts at meaningful political cooperation prefer the confrontational approach to solving Guyana’s problems.
The PNCR in propagating its case for shared-governance is unambiguous about its fixation over power which explains its glut and thirst that forced them into the “rigging” of elections prior to 1992 in Guyana. There is a direct correlation between the power-fixation and the dictatorship of the PNC.
The constitutional reform has so far given greater inclusiveness to the opposition in Guyana and these changes are no insignificant advancement as they would want us to believe. The amendments provided for reducing the powers of the President, an opposition veto on the appointment of the Chancellor and Chief Justice, strengthening the financial independence of the judiciary and Auditor General, expanding human rights, involving the National Assembly in the appointment of Service Commissions (Public, Police, Judicial and Teaching) establishment of five Standing Committee to examine and review government policy in the social, economic, foreign policy and natural resources sectors and a commission on the Rights of the Child, Gender Rights and Indigenous People.
While it would not be possible to go through all these reforms in this letter there are many more that all represent a genuine effort by the PPP/C Administration towards inclusiveness. The Opposition Leader and representatives are assigned key roles in effecting these constitutional functions such as sitting as Chair and Vice Chair on Parliamentary Committees. For example, the Public Accounts Committee is chaired by PNCR Member of Parliament, Volda Lawrence.
And I am not suggesting this might be the end-it-all of the exploration to inclusiveness but we need to understand that establishing systems, mechanisms whatever you like without genuine people who are patriotic and loyal to Guyana nothing will ever move forward.
Successive PPP/C Administrations since 1992 has advanced inclusiveness to accommodate greater involvement of the opposition parties and civil society. Unfortunately, largely these mechanisms have either been untapped or under-utilised by the primary beneficiaries. The PNCR has lost out on so many opportunities because of its counter productive behaviour, an elongated absence from Parliament and its own party politics of infighting.
Let us not pretend, shared governance at the extent of the PNCR’s hoping, in a society like Guyana would not succeed because of its intricate tapestry of rules and relationships, practice and policy. Any experiment of this kind is bound to take us backward with increased bureaucracy and unbearable puerility daunting the prospects of good governance.
This issue is neither single nor simple as any decision on shared-governance at the level proposed by the PNCR outside the existing model of inclusiveness has got to come from the electorate, the people themselves.
Shared-governance produces lingering suspicion and distrust even when experimented with more mature societies and can be a major setback for development as the focus shifts from development aspirations to narrow objectives aimed at sabotaging good intent.
Page 10 of the Government of Guyana paper, February 2003 “towards greater inclusive governance in Guyana” states and I quote “The PPP/C believes that a conscious effort is required by the major political parties to build trust and establish confidence.
Without such trust, suspicion will continue, motives will be questioned, policies will be judged on distorted criteria, resource allocation will always be followed by allegations of partisanship and agreements will be difficult to be arrived at.’’ The answer to shared-governance is for every one of us to take pride in being Guyanese with a common vision and aspiration for development, whether we are positioned in Government, Opposition or part of civil society.
The shared-governance proposition is a redemption contrived by the PNCR out of desperation to remain relevant to its constituent. It is this gambit that justifies the PNCR discredit of the present system of governance in Guyana. We need constant trust, integrity and dedication across the political spectrum that will produce a truly united and prosperous Guyana. The problem with our inclusiveness model is the absence of trust, integrity and dedication to nation-building by all. While we have been progressing steadily over the years the pace of our development could be quicken if all of us behave in a more responsible manner. It is genuineness and integrity that will move Guyana forward.
Kwame Mc Coy
Apr 04, 2025
Kaieteur Sports- The Georgetown Regional Conference continued in thrilling fashion on Wednesday at the National Gymnasium hardcourt, with dominant performances from Saints Stanislaus and Government...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- Vice President Bharrat Jagdeo has once again proven his talent for making the indefensible... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- Recent media stories have suggested that King Charles III could “invite” the United... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]