Self-defence is inconsistent with the intentional killing of innocent people

Jan 13, 2009 Letters

Dear Editor,
The action of Hamas, whether justified or unjustified, is not the causa belli, but is rather the casus belli in Gaza.
The action of Hamas cannot rationally be regarded as causatively related to the genocidal conduct of Israel against the Palestinian people. Rather, it has merely provided the occasion for the Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people.
Israel cannot plausibly claim that the action of Hamas in hiding and firing rockets from among the Palestinian people is justification for genocidal military exercises against the Palestinian people on the ground of self-defence, since the international killing of innocent people cannot be classified as collateral damage from necessary defensive action.
Self-defence is inconsistent with the intentional killing of innocent people. In any event, the use of excessive or unreasonable force is inconsistent with acting in self-defence. The force being used by Israel in its claim of self-defence is plainly and grossly excessive, and is inconsistent with the defence of self-defence.
It is not open to Israel to causatively attribute its current genocidal conduct against the Palestinian people to Hamas, since Israel, at the very least, must have foreseen as a certainty that its military action in Gaza, even if motivated by its desire to incapacitate Hamas, will involve the killing of innocent Palestinians in large numbers. Therefore, Israel is intentionally killing innocent Gazan Palestinians, and this nullifies Israel’s claim to be acting in self-defence. The conduct of Hamas is therefore not the causa but the casus for the genocidal conduct of
(Continued on page 5)

Dear Editor,
The action of Hamas, whether justified or unjustified, is not the causa belli, but is rather the casus belli in Gaza.
The action of Hamas cannot rationally be regarded as causatively related to the genocidal conduct of Israel against the Palestinian people. Rather, it has merely provided the occasion for the Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people.
Israel cannot plausibly claim that the action of Hamas in hiding and firing rockets from among the Palestinian people is justification for genocidal military exercises against the Palestinian people on the ground of self-defence, since the international killing of innocent people cannot be classified as collateral damage from necessary defensive action.
Self-defence is inconsistent with the intentional killing of innocent people. In any event, the use of excessive or unreasonable force is inconsistent with acting in self-defence. The force being used by Israel in its claim of self-defence is plainly and grossly excessive, and is inconsistent with the defence of self-defence.
It is not open to Israel to causatively attribute its current genocidal conduct against the Palestinian people to Hamas, since Israel, at the very least, must have foreseen as a certainty that its military action in Gaza, even if motivated by its desire to incapacitate Hamas, will involve the killing of innocent Palestinians in large numbers. Therefore, Israel is intentionally killing innocent Gazan Palestinians, and this nullifies Israel’s claim to be acting in self-defence. The conduct of Hamas is therefore not the causa but the casus for the genocidal conduct of Israel against the Palestinian people.
It is significant to note that Hamas is a Palestinian organisation, and not a State. However, Israel is a State. The genocidal conduct of Israel as a State against the Palestinian people not only provokes, but, arguably, now provides justification for genocidal conduct by the Palestinian people against Israel as a State.
Israel simply cannot use genocidal conduct by Hamas against it to justify its own genocidal conduct against the Palestinian people, because Hamas is not a State but merely an organisation which has no United Nations recognition as a representative organisation of the Palestinian people. Nor are the innocent Palestinians being killed representative of Hamas. Israel should ask itself whether its own current genocidal conduct against the Palestinian people does not now provide legal justification for the elimination of Israel as a State by the Palestinian people on the ground of self-defence.
Shawn Williams

Latest News

Self-defence is inconsistent with the intentional killing of innocent people

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| February, 14th, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Guyana boys team selected for 2025 PAHF Jr Challenge

Mainstay Goldstar FC receives NSC support ahead...

Lusignan Golf Club Announces the 2025 Ansa McAL...

Guyana U-20 Women’s squad arrives in Antigua...

GCB saddened at the passing of former GCB...

BCB strengthens Executive body as moves made to...

Features/Columnists

A flawed interpretation of international law

CARICOM Nations Should Respond Together To new U.S. Policies

Dissecting, dissembling, clearing up covering up

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]

Self-defence is inconsistent with the intentional killing of innocent people

Share this:

Related

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show|| February, 14th, 2025

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]