Latest update December 25th, 2024 1:10 AM
Jul 25, 2008 Features / Columnists, Peeping Tom
I was heartened recently when I read in the newspaper that Food for the Poor had constructed a small, not expensive nor fancy, home for someone who was disabled. The home was constructed on land provided by the government.
It is not the first time that Food for the Poor is doing this and they must be commended because that woman now has a roof over her head and thanks to Food for the Poor it is now her roof. She is the master of her own home.
The vast majority of poor people do not ask for very much. The vast majority of the poor in Guyana really want a roof under which to live.
As I have said so many times in these columns, no person should go hungry in Guyana. There is always somewhere that people can turn to get a meal. The real problem of poverty is homelessness.
This may be surprising, considering the vast number of house lots that the government has distributed. The bitter irony is that the homeless cannot afford to pay for these house lots much less to find money to put up even a shack. They are therefore left to find shelter on the streets.
I am not hitting the government’s housing programme. I think it was one of the outstanding achievements of Cheddi Jagan to have launched such a programme. Cheddi has allowed thousands of Guyanese to own their own home.
True, a few hundred have taken advantage and have used the policy to accumulate real estate, something that I feel the government has not taken seriously. I have said before in these columns that if the government wanted to know if house lot applicants had previously owned property all they had to do was to ask the applicants to get a tax compliance.
That person would know that the tax records would show whether they had ever done any transaction in relation to a property and if it was found that the Ministry of Housing was lied to, then stern action could have been taken.
I think we have reached the stage where we no longer need to increase the housing stock. What we should be doing is like what Food for the Poor is doing.
The government should set up a scheme for the desperately poor. They should put in infrastructure and then identify the poorest amongst the poor.
They should give priority to mothers with many children and then work with non-governmental organizations to build low cost homes for these persons.
In addition, the government should realize that in places such as Berbice there are hundreds of homes that are unoccupied because the owners have either gone abroad or have migrated to the city in search of jobs. The last census that was done in Guyana showed a very low population to building density in Berbice.
I believe that if jobs are created in that area, a great many of the young people who have been forced to leave their villages in search of jobs would return. With more jobs, people would go back home and the unoccupied buildings would be rented.
It is therefore important that the government try to encourage job-creation in rural Guyana. They can do this in two main ways. Firstly, they can encourage industry in those areas by establishing industrial sites.
Instead of GOINVEST sitting and waiting on investors to come forward, they should put together investment proposals and then try to find investors, be it local or foreign.
Secondly, I think that the poor people of Guyana need land. I am not here in any way supporting the seizure of private property. I am outright against that.
However, if someone has been leased a great deal of land from the State and is not utilizing that land, then it should be repossessed and given to someone else who may be willing to work the land.
There are many persons especially in the MMA scheme who have not paid their leases and these fees are a pittance when compared to the potential earnings that can accrue from the land.
I support the government reclaiming unutilized State land but giving it to persons with a demonstrated ability to find the capital and other resources to work the land.
Cheddi Jagan had a dream about every Guyanese family owning their own home. He also publicly indicated that he would like to see farmers owning up to 100 acres of land.
In these times that may be too much for a minimum land holding. I believe that for cash crop farmers ten-acre plots are good enough.
I believe that for rice, farmers need in excess of one hundred acres to be viable and for cattle rearing, 33 acres is a good minimum.
In Guyana we have a situation where some people have hundreds of acres and are not adequately utilizing it while some rice farmers are forced to subsist on as little as 5 acres. This is the sort of imbalance that must be corrected if we are going to help the poor.
If we give people the means to help themselves, many of them would not have to be running to Food for the Poor to build homes for them. They would be able with what they earn to build their own roofs over their heads.
This is something that Cheddi understood better than most. He also understood the statistic which said that 5% of the population own 75% of our land. He did not live long enough to reverse this inequitable situation.
Cheddi would have been deeply grieved by policies which try to pull people out of poverty without reaching down to the poorest of the poor.
He would have been disturbed that despite sharing out so many house lots, there are still families without a roof over their heads in Guyana.
It is a pity that his concern for the poor in Guyana is unmatched now that he has departed from this world.
Dec 25, 2024
Over 70 entries in as $7M in prizes at stake By Samuel Whyte Kaieteur Sports- The time has come and the wait is over and its gallop time as the biggest event for the year-end season is set for the...Peeping Tom… Kaieteur News- Ah, Christmas—the season of goodwill, good cheer, and, let’s not forget, good riddance!... more
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News- The year 2024 has underscored a grim reality: poverty continues to be an unyielding... more
Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.
Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]