Latest update November 16th, 2024 1:00 AM
Latest News
- AFC’s leader, Hughes promises to prioritize country’s interest above Exxon’s as law firm remains on company’s payroll
- Norton not opposed to referendum on renegotiation of oil contract
- Israel ramps up attacks on Lebanon as officials study US ceasefire plan
- Broken sluice door causes flooding in five WCB communities
- Miner dies after pit caves in at Issano Backdam
Parliamentary contributions of the Opposition…Granger, other APNU MPs ‘ineffective’ in the National Assembly – Chris Ram
– that is an unfair and misguided criticism – says Granger
By Kiana Wilburg
In the eyes of Attorney-at-law Christopher Ram, the Leader of A Partnership for National Unity (APNU),
David Granger,
APNU Leader
David Granger, and some of his parliamentarians, can be accused of being “ineffective” and “incompetent” if one were to examine their parliamentary contributions.
This is just one of the criticisms Ram made in his detailed two-part analysis of the APNU. Ram is of the opinion that the political opposition coalition makes too many excuses for its “poor performance.”
Ram commented on APNU’s “usual cry” of lack of resources being the cause for the coalition’s inability to perform effectively in the National Assembly.
In the face of some of Ram’s criticisms yesterday at his weekly press conference, Granger said that he finds Ram’s comments to be “unreasonable, misguided and unfair.” He insisted that he is pleased with the performances and contributions of his parliamentarians.
Ram on his website, www.chrisram.com explained that his analysis of the APNU was spurred by an APNU press conference a few months ago to mark the third anniversary of the coalition.
He made reference to comments made by Granger who had said that as the major opposition force in the National Assembly, and given its relatively “brief existence” it has made major progress despite the serious lack of facilities and resources.
Ram had also made reference to the fact that Granger had disagreed with the critics who said, since last year that APNU has not done adequate work. Granger had disagreed then, and he disagrees now.
The Chartered Accountant had said that Granger’s parliamentary interests have been “unimpressive and narrow”. Not a single Bill has he introduced a part from the 12 motions he had laid, said Ram.
“At the individual level Mr. Granger has fallen far short of what many would expect of the Leader of the Opposition.”
At a mere glance at the contributions by Granger’s shadow cabinet, Ram believes that with the exception of Carl Greenidge, other members have added little of substance to the proceedings of the National Assembly.
He said that the most productive opposition MP to the legislative agenda by far has been Greenidge, the APNU’s Shadow Finance Minister, who he reminded has introduced five Bills and more than a dozen motions, some of considerable significance.
Chartered Accountant, Chris Ram
With 26 members in the National Assembly, Ram insisted that the APNU would have been expected to do more – much, much more particularly when compared with the performance of the Alliance For Change.
Granger said, “I believe the people who question the APNU need to examine the role of the opposition, the resources available and the progress we made in making the government more accountable and on insisting on transparency…
“They also need to examine the progress we have made in attempting to make the Parliament office and the National Assembly truly autonomous and independent of the executive branch …
“We have had an uphill struggle in making this government more accountable to the people and to make the Parliament a place where real issues can be discussed.”
The Opposition leader said that counting the number of Bills tabled by an APNU MP, is not what constitutes parliamentary democracy and that Ram should examine the kind of Parliamentary democracy which took place under former House Speaker, Ralph Ramkarran.
“It is a qualitative difference and that is why we are talking about issues like the No-Confidence motion; because there has been a real change and we are holding them (government) to account…
“APNU has done a lot and the government knows it can’t fool around and it is on the ropes. It has to give explanations for things which were rampant in previous Parliaments but cannot take place now in the Tenth parliament…
“I am satisfied with what the APNU has done and I feel we have made tremendous progress over the last thirty months or more…I am very satisfied.”
Similar Articles
THE BLUNT OF THE DAY
Sports
Features/Columnists
Where is the talent in the PPP?
…Peeping Tom Kaieteur News- The People’s Progressive Party (PPP) and its exuberant General Secretary, Bharrat... more
Rising Gun Crimes in the Caribbean: Urgent Action required by all
By Sir Ronald Sanders Kaieteur News – There is an alarming surge in gun-related violence, particularly among younger... more
Weekend Cartoon
