Latest update November 5th, 2024 1:00 AM

Guyana's largest selling daily and New York's most popular weekly

Latest News

Did Forbes Burnham see me and Walter Rodney as Socrates’ children?

Jun 30, 2013 Letters

 

Dear Editor,
This is my final reply to Minette Bacchus. To continue a polemic with Bacchus is to encourage her in her pretence to intellectual claims. All her outpourings are banal repetitions of the same offering – Burnham didn’t kill Rodney; provide the evidence; Rodney was an adventurer; WPA knows what happened and it goes on ad naseum. She will respond to any argument with these repetitive asininities. She did it with Tacuma Ogunseye, M. Maxwell, me and Errol Harry. She will go on doing it. All you end with is self-abuse by continuing any discussion with this woman.
But in her jejune attempt to come across as an intellectual discussant, she has self-destructed. The supporters of Forbes Burnham are going to maul her after which they will exile her. Was Forbes Burnham a dictator? Guess who describes the nature of Burnham’s rule after which the only conclusion is that Burnham was a dictator. Here is Bacchus in her own words. I urge readers to read this quote twice or maybe thrice or four of five times.
Bacchus wrote the follows words about how Burnham saw me (KN June 25); “The Forbes Burnham Government refused to employ a dishonourable person to lecture in Guyana’s highest institution of learning. Kissoon was however fortunate under other administrations to be employed where he was given the opportunity to influence young and impressionable minds.” (end of quote)
In 1974, after UG approved an appointment for Walter Rodney, Burnham intervened. Ten years after, he did the same thing to me. I came home from Grenada in 1984, got a UG appointment but Burnham intervened. What I am only learning now twenty eight years after, was that Burnham denied me employment at UG because I was not good enough to teach young people. Socrates was charged for treason for corrupting young minds. So I guess Burnham thought that Walter Rodney, Frederick Kissoon, Andaiye, Bonita Bone, Dr. Mohammed Insanally, Dr. Katheen Drayton were not good enough to be exposed to young students. So we were either denied employment or sacked.
So Burnham, as we are now told by Bacchus, determined who work in their own country. UG was Burnham’s personal institution so he decided who could be employed there. But if my memory served me right, Burnham didn’t have an electoral mandate to decide who worked at UG. According to the political studies I did at three universities, this kind of action by Burnham would be classified as dictatorship. But Bacchus would say no. Burnham was right. He had the right to chose which Guyanese was to be employed where in their own country.  I wonder if Bacchus supports the same practice under the PPP in today’s Guyana?
So there we have it. Burnham was a dictator and it came from the mouth of Minette Bacchus. I hope the Governor of New York is not inclined to decide who should work at which place in New York where Bacchus lives. If he assumes that power, I wonder if Bacchus would approve of him sacking her from her job. Now I am assuming all (not most) readers would like to hear from Bacchus as to where Burnham got those powers that he used against the names I referred to above. But I could answer that. Bacchus would tell us that Burnham was the elected President of Guyana therefore he had the right to decide who worked in Guyana period!
Finally, Bacchus wrote that I pointed to some great achievements of Burnham but when she does the same I criticize her. What Bacchus left out (and which she is incapable of understanding) is that I criticize her because she leaves out the other half – the bad side of Burnham. I write on both sides when it comes to Jagan and Burnham. They had great qualities and horrible qualities at the same time. But let me acknowledge that Bacchus may be changing. Her description of Burnham’s illegal and immoral denial of Guyanese the right to work in their own country is admission that Burnham was a dictator. I close my letter by saying that I can forgive Burnham for my employment denial, not the victimization of my wife. Burnham had no right to victimize her. She was purely a non-political person
Frederick Kissoon

 

 

Similar Articles

The Glenn Lall Show | September. 30th, 2024

Follow on Tik Tok @Glennlall

October 1st turn off your lights to bring about a change!

THE BLUNT OF THE DAY

Sports

Uncertainty clouds Golden Jaguars’ Head Coach position as Barbados showdown approaches

Uncertainty clouds Golden Jaguars’ Head Coach position as...

Nov 05, 2024

  By Rawle Toney Kaieteur  Sports- With less than two weeks before the Golden Jaguars meet Barbados in back-to-back encounters that could shape their Gold Cup destiny, the Guyana Football...
Read More
Greaves makes history with magnificent 151* to lead Hurricanes to seven-wicket win over Red Force

Greaves makes history with magnificent 151* to...

Nov 05, 2024

Dominica’s Olympic champion Thea LaFond-Gadson awarded nation’s highest honour

Dominica’s Olympic champion Thea LaFond-Gadson...

Nov 05, 2024

Julien Alfred named finalist for World Track Athlete of the Year among elite group of Olympic champions

Julien Alfred named finalist for World Track...

Nov 05, 2024

Junior Sinclair replaces Kevin Sinclair in the CG United Super 50 Cup 2024

Junior Sinclair replaces Kevin Sinclair in the CG...

Nov 05, 2024

Hamilton Green KO Football Championship starts Friday

Hamilton Green KO Football Championship starts...

Nov 05, 2024

Features/Columnists

Publisher’s Note

Freedom of speech is our core value at Kaieteur News. If the letter/e-mail you sent was not published, and you believe that its contents were not libellous, let us know, please contact us by phone or email.

Feel free to send us your comments and/or criticisms.
Contact: 624-6456; 225-8452; 225-8458; 225-8463; 225-8465; 225-8473 or 225-8491.
Or by Email: [email protected] / [email protected]

Weekend Cartoon

Bridge Watch

Demerara Harbour Bridge

> Berbice Bridge […]